The new Apple display looks amazing and that stand is just a piece of work. The specs read as the ultimate is display technology and looks to be the monitor of choice for any modern Mac.
However, in my industry (photography) the ultimate has always been Eizo. Their reputation built on build quality, screen uniformity and ultimately colour accuracy. I profile my screen with a colour meter every month to ensure its working at tip top performance and the brightness is relatively low as I work in a darkened studio environment.
Not seen any tests or mention on here where people have tested the accuracy or the calibration potential of the XDR with the usual screen calibration tools and software. Can the nano surface version even be calibrated with a colour meter or is the XDR a set (at the factory) and forget type of devise where the display can calibrate itself somehow?
So all you lucky few with the XDR Pro, what is your use case for this monitor.
However, in my industry (photography) the ultimate has always been Eizo. Their reputation built on build quality, screen uniformity and ultimately colour accuracy. I profile my screen with a colour meter every month to ensure its working at tip top performance and the brightness is relatively low as I work in a darkened studio environment.
Not seen any tests or mention on here where people have tested the accuracy or the calibration potential of the XDR with the usual screen calibration tools and software. Can the nano surface version even be calibrated with a colour meter or is the XDR a set (at the factory) and forget type of devise where the display can calibrate itself somehow?
So all you lucky few with the XDR Pro, what is your use case for this monitor.
