Hi,
I've just bought a 160gb external HDD and am intending to use it primarily to move and access data on my G4 Powerbook. However, I'd like to be able to put some files from my PC laptop on it as well. Am wondering if i should go with -
Option 1: Partition the disk as half FAT32 and half HFS+ --> Disadvantage: HFS+ partition will be invisible to PCs (i.e. data inaccessible on PCs unless i purchase macdrive
)
Option 2: Format it fully as FAT32 (and have all subsequent partitions as FAT32 as well) --> Disadvantage: Have read that OSX has inefficiency issues with FAT32? (know about 4gb filesize limit but this doesn't affect me so much).
Am tempted to go with Option 2 at this point but would like to find out the extent to which performance (data handling efficiency, access speed and data stability) will be impaired on OSX... (as compared to HFS+)
Can anyone please advise on this?
If I were to go with Option 1, however, would I be right in saying that in order for the disk to be recognized by a PC, it would need to first be formatted as FAT32 before you can go on to subsequently specify individual partition formats?
P.S.: Have tried to look up this (and other) forums with regards to FAT32 vs HFS+ and have included some of the more relevant links below... but as I'm a techdummy, I'm not sure if I'm reading all this information correctly, hence the posting!!!
http://cph.blogsome.com/2005/09/04/usb-harddrive-on-mac-windows-and-linux/
http://forums.macosxhints.com/showthread.php?t=58302
http://forums.macosxhints.com/showthread.php?t=68254
http://forums.macosxhints.com/showthread.php?t=71450
http://forums.macosxhints.com/showthread.php?t=68604 <-- contradicted by the next thread....
http://forums.macosxhints.com/showthread.php?t=70826
http://www.macworld.com/forums/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=461740&an=0&page=0#461740
http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showtopic=4404
I've just bought a 160gb external HDD and am intending to use it primarily to move and access data on my G4 Powerbook. However, I'd like to be able to put some files from my PC laptop on it as well. Am wondering if i should go with -
Option 1: Partition the disk as half FAT32 and half HFS+ --> Disadvantage: HFS+ partition will be invisible to PCs (i.e. data inaccessible on PCs unless i purchase macdrive
Option 2: Format it fully as FAT32 (and have all subsequent partitions as FAT32 as well) --> Disadvantage: Have read that OSX has inefficiency issues with FAT32? (know about 4gb filesize limit but this doesn't affect me so much).
Am tempted to go with Option 2 at this point but would like to find out the extent to which performance (data handling efficiency, access speed and data stability) will be impaired on OSX... (as compared to HFS+)
If I were to go with Option 1, however, would I be right in saying that in order for the disk to be recognized by a PC, it would need to first be formatted as FAT32 before you can go on to subsequently specify individual partition formats?
P.S.: Have tried to look up this (and other) forums with regards to FAT32 vs HFS+ and have included some of the more relevant links below... but as I'm a techdummy, I'm not sure if I'm reading all this information correctly, hence the posting!!!
http://cph.blogsome.com/2005/09/04/usb-harddrive-on-mac-windows-and-linux/
http://forums.macosxhints.com/showthread.php?t=58302
http://forums.macosxhints.com/showthread.php?t=68254
http://forums.macosxhints.com/showthread.php?t=71450
http://forums.macosxhints.com/showthread.php?t=68604 <-- contradicted by the next thread....
http://forums.macosxhints.com/showthread.php?t=70826
http://www.macworld.com/forums/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=461740&an=0&page=0#461740
http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showtopic=4404