Follow up to all saying “but this is the mac app store” the mobile app store is similarly filled to the brim with garbage and scam apps too!
I can hear that ShamWow ad in my head now, thanks a lot 😂😂😂
You telling me Apple doesn't review apps before approving them on the Mac App store?Stop misleading people, this is the Mac App Store, nothing like the Walled garden which is IOS & IPADOS 😡
And this actually shows, the consequences of an Open Platform!
Nothing is going to stop all scammers. You have to still use your brain when downloading stuff.But I was told the reason we couldn’t have sideloading on iOS/iPadOS was to protect us from scams like this!
I did not fall for any scam apps (because I'm cynical AF) but it's pretty easy to fall prey to this - especially as Apple keeps harping on about how curated their store is.So, we are to believe that the Venn diagram of “App Store users that don’t know better” and “App Store users that know what ChatGPT is” are NOT two completely separate circles?
As I understand it, Apple already does the "banning" part you mentioned. A government-issued ID is not required for that.Then when a developer is caught scamming, gaming the reviews, or blatantly copying someone else's copyrighted app, you ban them from the Apple developer ecosystem for life.
Except we aren't talking about outside apps being installed we are taking about apps available on Apple's curated and supposedly proected app store. I would be far more inclined to trust a Chat GPT app downloaded directly from the makers website than an app store app calling itself Chat GPT. We all know at this point that scam apps are a dime a dozen on both Mac OS as well as iOS.Stop misleading people, this is the Mac App Store, nothing like the Walled garden which is IOS & IPADOS 😡
And this actually shows, the consequences of an Open Platform!
doubt they are that sophisticated!How long before these companies petition the EU regulators saying that Apple may adversely affect their market with uncompetitive practices?
Do you actually believe the scam app in question was side loaded? If not then what are you even taking about? Considering this app was downloaded from Apple's own controlled app store and not an outside source proves the exact opposite of the point you were trying to make. Clearly Apple can't protect us and we'd be better off getting our apps directly from the developers and cutting out the incompetent greedy middle man.Just a teaser for what it about to come when side loading is enforced by Governments.
the modesty around admitting errors extends to when when you falsely point out errors in text that actually is factually correct (or close to).AI in general does have a certain "creepiness" to it, in that it's increasingly programmed to be more like us while still clearly not hitting the mark in many areas. There are a lot of beneficial and potentially good uses for it, along with a degree of danger.
I think we might be surprised to know how much "artificial intelligence" is already present in the products we own. A good example might be automobiles. Most cars made nowadays have a built-in network of microprocessors that communicate with each other to make decisions based on the condition of the other systems, to increase driver comfort or prolong the life of certain components. It doesn't have a language-based interface, but it does have a certain degree of programmed "intelligence."
The danger with chatGPT in particular is that the language model is so sophisticated that it can be mistaken for a human, yet it often spews out disinformation and falsehoods as if they were true. Fortunately, its programmers have created modesty subroutines to allow it to recognize its own mistakes, but that's only when the mistakes are actually pointed out. There are a lot of people who will take chatGPT at face value (like people who take the news media or TV at face value), believing it to be true simply because it uses language that people normally use and seems to "know" a great deal of things. Maybe I'm missing your point, though 😌
As I understand it, Apple already does the "banning" part you mentioned. A government-issued ID is not required for that.
The problem seems to be that Apple cannot properly review the mass of apps in its review hopper, without cutting corners. Further, scammy app developers are getting better at coding their apps in a way that will evade Apple's automated review tools and processes.
I also feel yucky about having to wade through the hundreds of sketchy-looking apps when I'm searching for something genuinely useful. Most of the time, I just give up on the Mac App Store and do a Web search for anything that might work, Apple-approved or not. The App Store is a convenience, but it's also fallible and will always be. The Microsoft Store for purchasing and managing apps is no better, and Google hasn't done a bang-up job with the Play Store either. Even Setapp has its lemons.
Caveat emptor, as they say.
Asked ChatGPT to write a song to the tune of Gangster’s Paradise:I gave up on Apple's App store long ago. It has become a scammer's paradise.
I see your point about tying accounts to personal ID.Sure, Apple can ban the developer now.
But how easy is for the developer to simply create another account?
Tie the account to his personal ID, and that particular developer is banned for life.
It's making the creation of another account harder that my government ID suggestion is for.
Definitely AI-generated, but it certainly (and sadly) rings true in placesAsked ChatGPT to write a song to the tune of Gangster’s Paradise:
Sure! Here's my take on it: