Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Void5150

macrumors member
Original poster
Sep 19, 2014
50
0
I'm considering the following Macbook Pro:

15 inch w/ Retina display
2.5GHz quad-core Intel Core i7
Turbo Boost up to 3.7GHz
16GB 1600MHz memory
512GB PCIe-based flash storage 1
Intel Iris Pro Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M with 2GB GDDR5 memory​

Is it worth spending $200 to upgrade the CPU to 2.8 GHz?

Would there be a big noticable difference?

Thanks. I've been asking a lot of questions. ;)
 
I'm considering the following Macbook Pro:

15 inch w/ Retina display
2.5GHz quad-core Intel Core i7
Turbo Boost up to 3.7GHz
16GB 1600MHz memory
512GB PCIe-based flash storage 1
Intel Iris Pro Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M with 2GB GDDR5 memory​

Is it worth spending $200 to upgrade the CPU to 2.8 GHz?

Would there be a big noticable difference?

Thanks. I've been asking a lot of questions. ;)
Unless you are using your computer to make money, and making money with your computer involves pegging the CPU at 100% for hours on end, it's not worth it.

The difference in day to day usage would be impossible to notice.
 
I'm considering the following Macbook Pro:

15 inch w/ Retina display
2.5GHz quad-core Intel Core i7
Turbo Boost up to 3.7GHz
16GB 1600MHz memory
512GB PCIe-based flash storage 1
Intel Iris Pro Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M with 2GB GDDR5 memory​

Is it worth spending $200 to upgrade the CPU to 2.8 GHz?

Would there be a big noticable difference?

Thanks. I've been asking a lot of questions. ;)

Nope, there's almost zero difference.

And besides, if you stress-test both CPUs in Macoh, the 2.8GHz actually throttles in some of the tests, while the 2.5GHz variant doesn't throttle (although both have the same TDP).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.