Can i replace a dead superdrive in a mac mini late 2009 with a working one from a macbook late 2009? Thanks in advance.
The ODD in the Mac Mini (Late 2009) is a SATA slot-in Superdrive of 12.7mm.
Compatible models (of various performance) are :
- Matshita UJ-868A (RPC1)
- Matshita UJ-875A / UJ-875B
- Matshita UJ-880A
- Sony Optiarc AD-5670S (RPC1)
- Sony Optiarc AD-5680H (RPC1)
- Sony Optiarc AD-5690H / AD-7690H (RPC1)
- Sony Optiarc AD-7580S
- Sony Optiarc AD-7640S / AD-7643S
- Sony Optiarc AD-7670S (RPC1)
- Pioneer DVR-TS08PA
- Hitachi-LG GA11N
- Hitachi-LG GA31F
- Hitachi-LG GA31N
- Hitachi-LG GA32N
If your spare drive is one of those, it should fit.
Use System Information OS X utility to check the ODD model in your Macbook.
After i installed mountain lion, it's faster than before but still somewhat slow. I'm thinking that I'll need to replace the hard disk or upgrade the ram from 2 GB to 8 GB. If you could only do one upgrade, which would it be?
The bang for the buck of RAM is measured in GB per $, and the 2GB sticks for $30 are definitively not it.Best bang for buck is one 2GB RAM stick to take you to 3GB. (Some might argue this makes no difference.) If you want matching pairs, you'll need two x 2GB for 4GB.
Best bang for the buck is a 7200RPM drive. 60 bucks for a 7200rpm Scorpio Black 750Gb. The internal one is the biggest bottle neck. I popped in a left-over set of 1333mhz 2011 Mini RAM, so I had a free 4Gb RAM upgrade. You can buy these very well second hand for 10 bucks or so, nobody wants 2x2GB 1333mhz for computers with 1333mhz busses. Total new machine.
SSD is an option too, but remember this mini only has SATA 300, so you wast half the speed of most drives, the 7200rpm manages to get 180Mb/s, on a 300Mb/s bus, I think that is quite effective. And you have much storage for little money. I use the Mini as HTPC and then SSD is total nonsense.
The bang for the buck of RAM is measured in GB per $, and the 2GB sticks for $30 are definitively not it.
Wouldn't even consider wasting money on a new platter-based hard drive, not even 7200rpm. This is not 2009.
I have an old Sata 3 machine and added a 3,5 inch Seagate barracuda 3TB drive. Sorry, but SSD would be no alternative. I might win a few seconds on booting the OS and the applications, but boy this beast is fast in crawling through my 2 TB of movies and photo's. On disk access, this machine feels snappier than my new Mini with SSD and external storage.
I replaced the 120Gb hard drive on my 2009 MacBook with a 240Gb SSD, which I got on eBay for about £100. It COMPLETELY revolutionised the speed and responsiveness of my MacBook. I couldn't believe how much of a bottleneck the old hard drive had been.I think they're [SSDs] overrated for old computers, but they are certainly very fast on newer computers. Hard drives are hard to figure out if they're going to be fast or not. But for space per $$, i'd rather have a big hard drive than small ssd. Luckly with most macs, you can fit 2 hard drives inside.
I replaced the 120Gb hard drive on my 2009 MacBook with a 240Gb SSD, which I got on eBay for about £100. It COMPLETELY revolutionised the speed and responsiveness of my MacBook. I couldn't believe how much of a bottleneck the old hard drive had been.
SSDs are NOT over-rated for older computers: they are a cheap means of extending the computer's useful life.
If you've got an SSD and an HDD, then you should definitely make a Fusion Volume if you're running Mountain Lion. Then you'll get the speed of an SSD with the capacity of an HDD, and no need to spend time sorting out which data goes where.