http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2321677,00.asp
Interesting that PC Mag doesn't know that (1) AT&T is subsidizing the iPhone 3G so that Apple is getting much more than $199 per iPhone, and (2) Apple has many costs other than manufacturing, so calling the $26 difference between manufacturing cost and retail price "profit" is more than a bit stupid.
And then they have the cojones to state that the cost of manufacturing the iPhone will drop to $126 in 2012 if left unchanged, ignoring the obvious that the iPhone of 2012 will be much different than the iPhone of 2008, and that any attempt to predict electronic component prices over the next four years is a bit silly. Brainiacs over there at PC World.
Interesting that PC Mag doesn't know that (1) AT&T is subsidizing the iPhone 3G so that Apple is getting much more than $199 per iPhone, and (2) Apple has many costs other than manufacturing, so calling the $26 difference between manufacturing cost and retail price "profit" is more than a bit stupid.
And then they have the cojones to state that the cost of manufacturing the iPhone will drop to $126 in 2012 if left unchanged, ignoring the obvious that the iPhone of 2012 will be much different than the iPhone of 2008, and that any attempt to predict electronic component prices over the next four years is a bit silly. Brainiacs over there at PC World.