Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Original poster
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/21/mac_os_x_lion_security/

Researchers: Apple’s Mac OS X Lion is the king of security

“With Wednesday’s release of Mac OS X Lion, Apple has definitively leapfrogged its rivals by offering an operating system with state-of-the-art security protections that make it more resistant to malware exploits and other hack attacks, two researchers say,” Dan Goodin reports for The Register.

“The most important addition is full ASLR. Short for address space layout randomization, the protection makes it much harder for attackers to exploit bugs by regularly changing the memory location where shell code and other system components are loaded. Other improvements include security sandboxes that tightly restrict the way applications can interact with other parts of the operating system and full disk encryption that doesn’t interfere with other OS features,” Goodin reports. “‘It’s a significant improvement, and the best way that I’ve described the level of security in Lion is that it’s Windows 7, plus, plus,’ said Dino Dai Zovi, principal of security consultancy Trail of Bits and the coauthor of The Mac Hacker’s Handbook. ‘I generally tell Mac users that if they care about security, they should upgrade to Lion sooner rather than later, and the same goes for Windows users, too.’”

“With virtually all browser exploits targeting the way the program parses web content, Apple engineers have tightly locked down the new process, called Safari Web Content. The design is intended to limit the damage that can be done in the event an attacker is able to exploit a buffer overflow or other bug in the browser,” Goodin reports. “‘Now, you end up inside this restricted process that only does the web parsing, and you can’t do other things you might want to do as an attacker, such as write files or read a person’s documents,’ Charlie Miller, principal research consultant at security firm Accuvant and the other coauthor of The Mac Hacker’s Handbook, explained. ‘Even when you get code execution, you no longer have free rein to do whatever you want. You can do only what the sandbox allows you to do.’”

------------------------------------------------------

That's quite an endorsement.

Yet another reason to get Lion, folks. :)
 

TheSideshow

macrumors 6502
Apr 21, 2011
392
0
So now we admit Snow Leopard security wasn't up to snuff?'

From the same article:
Although ASLR made its OS X debut in Leopard, the predecessor to Snow Leopard, its implementation was woefully inadequate because it failed to randomize core parts of the OS, including the heap, stack, and dynamic linker. That meant entire classes of exploits were automatically immune to the protection.

It also prompted many to wonder why Apple engineers bothered to put it into the OS in the first place, or didn't properly implement it with the introduction of Snow Leopard. Windows Vista and Ubuntu, by contrast, added much more robust implementations of ASLR years earlier.
 

KingCrimson

macrumors 65816
Mar 12, 2011
1,066
0

Hellhammer

Moderator emeritus
Dec 10, 2008
22,164
582
Finland
All OSs are said to be super-secure until some hacker finds a massive security hole. It's not that important what Apple says and what has been added. The OS is as safe as its most vulnerable line of code.
 

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Original poster
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
All new OS's claim to be the most secure ever. And they are because no ones started to exploit them yet! Talk about stating the obvious.

When someone like Charlie Miller says it, the person Apple naysayers like to turn to in glee, it's quite something.
 

Shrink

macrumors G3
Feb 26, 2011
8,929
1,727
New England, USA
So now we admit Snow Leopard security wasn't up to snuff?'

From the same article:
Although ASLR made its OS X debut in Leopard, the predecessor to Snow Leopard, its implementation was woefully inadequate because it failed to randomize core parts of the OS, including the heap, stack, and dynamic linker. That meant entire classes of exploits were automatically immune to the protection.

It also prompted many to wonder why Apple engineers bothered to put it into the OS in the first place, or didn't properly implement it with the introduction of Snow Leopard. Windows Vista and Ubuntu, by contrast, added much more robust implementations of ASLR years earlier.

Apparently it is impossible to be pleased by anything. It's called "making improvements".

I think great that the security is improved. Just a little less to worry about - at least for the moment. ;)
 

KingCrimson

macrumors 65816
Mar 12, 2011
1,066
0
The thing is Microsoft has more people working on security so I expect Windows 8 to be the most secure non-Linux OS ever.
 

TheSideshow

macrumors 6502
Apr 21, 2011
392
0
When someone like Charlie Miller says it, the person Apple naysayers like to turn to in glee, it's quite something.

Charlie Miller never said it. That was quoting someone else.

Charlie Miller just figured out he could install malware to Mac batteries and brick, destroy, or continuously infect/reinfect a mac with it.

Nothing security wise is new in Lion that wasnt in another OS.
Windows had ASLR, Drive Encryption, and sandboxing for a while now. Whether Lion is better implemented, we'll see.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.