Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,467
37,705


With Qi2 chargers hitting the market in increasing numbers, I've recently spent some time testing out two similar "tree-style" 3-in-1 desktop chargers from Anker and Belkin. 3-in-1 chargers like these, which are capable of charging an iPhone, and Apple Watch, and another device such as AirPods, all wirelessly, have been my go-to bedside charger style ever since the introduction of MagSafe and are very popular with users in general, so I thought it would be worthwhile to see how a couple of the latest options perform.

anker-belkin-qi2-3-in-1-chargers.jpg
Anker (left) and Belkin (right) Qi2 3-in-1 chargers

Both the Anker MagGo Wireless Charging Station (3-in-1 Stand) and the Belkin BoostCharge Pro 3-in-1 Magnetic Wireless Charging Stand with Qi2 15W offer 15-watt Qi2 phone charging support that is equivalent to MagSafe without needing to license or source components from Apple, while official fast-charging pucks are used to ensure maximum Apple Watch charging performance. The base of each model includes a standard 5-watt Qi charging spot, which is plenty to charge up any AirPods model that includes a wireless charging case. Both the Anker and Belkin models are available in black or white with color-matched cables and power adapters. Anker uses a standard USB-C to USB-C cable while Belkin uses a fixed cable that ends in a USB-C connector, so that's potentially something to consider one way or the other for either aesthetics or product longevity.

belkin-qi2-3-in-1-charger-devices.jpg

While both chargers utilize a relatively heavy base for stability and as an AirPods charging spot, their "trunk and branches" with elevated charging pads for an iPhone and an Apple Watch differ slightly in design, with the Belkin model using a forward-angled main support topped by a single horizontal bar with the phone charging pad at one end and the Apple Watch charger at the other, while the Anker model uses an offset vertical trunk with separate phone and Apple Watch charging pads at different heights. The Anker design results in a bit narrower overall profile with an iPhone and Apple Watch mounted on the chargers, but the Apple Watch can end up somewhat hidden behind the phone in certain configurations such as with the phone in landscape StandBy mode.

anker-qi2-3-in-1-charger-devices-standby.jpg

The base on the Belkin model is sort of a flat mound with a small depression to help guide your AirPods to the proper charging spot, while the Anker base is more dish-like with a small rim surrounding a flat top. The AirPods charging spot is a separate component embedded in the surface of the base and it's made of a slightly different material, so you can see the outline of the charger to help guide placement, plus there's a light gray Qi logo in the middle of the charging spot. Neither model offers magnets in this charging spot to help make proper placement even easier.

anker-qi2-3-in-1-charger-devices.jpg

Overall, the Belkin design offers significantly more stability for a mounted phone in my experience, as tapping the phone or generating vibrations on the desk surface will cause the phone to wiggle a fair amount while on the Anker charger, but it remains nearly rock steady while on the Belkin charger. If you're planning to use one of these chargers on a desk or other situation where you'll be interacting with the phone while it's charging, this difference alone is enough to argue for the Belkin in my opinion, as the amount of wobble on the Anker charger is significant.

belkin-qi2-3-in-1-charger.jpg

Looking at the Qi2 phone charging pad itself, the Belkin version has the advantage of an adjustable angle anywhere between fully vertical and fully horizontal, letting you position it however you prefer. The phone pad on the Anker model is at a fixed angle that should work for most people, but the option of adjustments on the Belkin model is a nice feature. The Belkin phone charger also has an understated look with a plain black or white surface matching the base, while the Anker Qi2 charging surface is white on both the black and white model and it has Qi2 branding and "Wireless Power IQ" text on it that makes for a less clean look.

anker-qi2-3-in-1-charger.jpg

Both chargers were able to take an iPhone 15 Pro Max from 30% to ~80% in about an hour, pretty much exactly in line with what I see from Apple's official MagSafe charger. The charging rate starts to slow significantly beyond that to prevent overheating and overcharging, with all three chargers bringing the phone to around 95% after 90 minutes.

When it comes to the Apple Watch charging puck, the Anker and Belkin units are essentially identical, which makes sense considering these parts are sourced from Apple. On both models, the puck itself is white on both black and white color options. I'd love to see some other puck color options from Apple to help third-party manufacturers offer more flexibility in their own color offerings.

Given that these are official Apple Watch modules, they both suffer from one of the common issues some users have complained about with Apple Watch chargers, and that's the fact that the watch has a tendency to rotate while on the charger. While the watch attaches to the charger magnetically, there's nothing offering any rotational stability, so the weight of the watch or band can result in the watch twisting a bit while on the charger.

anker-qi2-3-in-1-charger-sticker.jpg

To its credit, Anker has tried to address this by including a sheet of round stickers that can be placed on the surface of the charging puck to increase friction and reduce the watch's tendency to rotate. This solution does work pretty well, but the sticker is a bit of an eyesore with a tab to facilitate removal hanging over the edge of the puck and a plus-shaped cut in the center of the sticker to allow it to conform to the slightly concave surface of the puck.

The tree-style designs of these chargers means neither one supports Night... Click here to read rest of article

Article Link: Review: Anker and Belkin 3-in-1 Chargers Offer New Qi2 Options for Desk and Nightstand Charging
 
  • Like
Reactions: O.N.Y.X
I wonder, do Qi2 chargers display the charging animation when you set your phone on them? I remember being disappointed my Anker Magsafe charger didn't do that, and that apparently the charger has to be officially licensed by Apple to display the animation.

(It's purely a cosmetic issue, as it charges just fine.)
 
i was given a previous model of the belkin stand by an apple store as a courtesy gift for some service issues (mostly from AT&T's end, and not because i gave them any grief. the manager was just super nice).

it's quite a nice stand, and really convenient. i do not get $150 of value, personally, but i suppose the convenience itself of one stand to plug in and charge everything is nice. if that singular item with a cleaner setup is worth it to you, it does its job well.
 
I got the Belkin (as pictured in the article) and my Apple Watch Ultra 2 kept rotating when placed on the stand; ended up returning it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Cockney Rebel
I wonder, do Qi2 chargers display the charging animation when you set your phone on them? I remember being disappointed my Anker Magsafe charger didn't do that, and that apparently the charger has to be officially licensed by Apple to display the animation.

(It's purely a cosmetic issue, as it charges just fine.)
They do - I have one of these anker's and it shows the charge start animation. I believe they also communicate same way magsafe does so phone can identify the charger it's placed on for customisation but I haven't played with that.
 
I’m baffled by how these products are so expensive - Anker is $99 for what? 3 wireless charging coils and a couple magnets?!

Meanwhile, a USB C/ Lightning cable which will charge your phone faster, and cooler, with much higher efficiency is $6.99….
Yeah, I can't deny it costs more than I'd consider 'reasonable' for what it does.. but got it as a birthday present. And it did tidy up my nightstand charging arrangement nicely. - Though it's a shame theres no magnetic alignment for the airpods chargers on these.
 
I was searching for the Belkin model on Amazon, and this charging station was right next to the Belkin. Not saying it’s better, just a staggering price difference: https://a.co/d/00ozxdr9

Edit:never mind, it’s a different model of Belkin that this one mimics.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Anker sucks now. I've gotten several faulty products from them in the last few years. I had 2 3-in-1 charging stands for a MagSafe phone, wireless charge headphones, and a spot for the Apple Watch charger. Both of them ended up getting HOT TO THE TOUCH. Hot enough to burn your hand touching it. Amazon reviews have people saying it melted their headphones, and they were still for sale. I also have an extension cord cube from them with several USB ports that just stop working all the time until I unplug it from the wall and reset it.

Isn't Eufy also part of Anker? The company that had live streams of peoples' security cameras unsecured on the internet and then refused to comment about it for days or weeks?
 
I got the Anker one in black a few weeks ago when Amazon had a lightning deal for $70. Works quite well. I did opt to use the sticker to keep the watch from rotating and that works for the most part. I agree it looks weird with the little tab, almost looks like it was a protective sticker for shipment and I forgot to remove. Both phone and watch charge at decent rate. I wasn't going to use wireless charging on my phone but my old dock was lightning and I had to replace it with USB-C due to new iPhone and there are basically no iPhone docks with USB-C, they all favor magsafe now.

I happy to report there's no buzzing coming from the 40W PD brick they send with this. And it's a clean look with a single wire connected to the tree, previous dock had one per device so I had 3 wires going to it and each had its own power brick.

I agree that it's overpriced but I think Apple makes these companies pay a decent amount for certified hardware to support fast charge.

After a couple of weeks of use, I recommend this charger. I hope it holds up for a while due to how expensive it is, I don't want to buy another anytime soon.
 


With Qi2 chargers hitting the market in increasing numbers, I've recently spent some time testing out two similar "tree-style" 3-in-1 desktop chargers from Anker and Belkin. 3-in-1 chargers like these, which are capable of charging an iPhone, and Apple Watch, and another device such as AirPods, all wirelessly, have been my go-to bedside charger style ever since the introduction of MagSafe and are very popular with users in general, so I thought it would be worthwhile to see how a couple of the latest options perform.


anker-belkin-qi2-3-in-1-chargers.jpg


Anker (left) and Belkin (right) Qi2 3-in-1 chargers

Both the Anker MagGo Wireless Charging Station (3-in-1 Stand) and the Belkin BoostCharge Pro 3-in-1 Magnetic Wireless Charging Stand with Qi2 15W offer 15-watt Qi2 phone charging support that is equivalent to MagSafe without needing to license or source components from Apple, while official fast-charging pucks are used to ensure maximum Apple Watch charging performance. The base of each model includes a standard 5-watt Qi charging spot, which is plenty to charge up any AirPods model that includes a wireless charging case. Both the Anker and Belkin models are available in black or white with color-matched cables and power adapters. Anker uses a standard USB-C to USB-C cable while Belkin uses a fixed cable that ends in a USB-C connector, so that's potentially something to consider one way or the other for either aesthetics or product longevity.

belkin-qi2-3-in-1-charger-devices.jpg

While both chargers utilize a relatively heavy base for stability and as an AirPods charging spot, their "trunk and branches" with elevated charging pads for an iPhone and an Apple Watch differ slightly in design, with the Belkin model using a forward-angled main support topped by a single horizontal bar with the phone charging pad at one end and the Apple Watch charger at the other, while the Anker model uses an offset vertical trunk with separate phone and Apple Watch charging pads at different heights. The Anker design results in a bit narrower overall profile with an iPhone and Apple Watch mounted on the chargers, but the Apple Watch can end up somewhat hidden behind the phone in certain configurations such as with the phone in landscape StandBy mode.

anker-qi2-3-in-1-charger-devices-standby.jpg

The base on the Belkin model is sort of a flat mound with a small depression to help guide your AirPods to the proper charging spot, while the Anker base is more dish-like with a small rim surrounding a flat top. The AirPods charging spot is a separate component embedded in the surface of the base and it's made of a slightly different material, so you can see the outline of the charger to help guide placement, plus there's a light gray Qi logo in the middle of the charging spot. Neither model offers magnets in this charging spot to help make proper placement even easier.

anker-qi2-3-in-1-charger-devices.jpg

Overall, the Belkin design offers significantly more stability for a mounted phone in my experience, as tapping the phone or generating vibrations on the desk surface will cause the phone to wiggle a fair amount while on the Anker charger, but it remains nearly rock steady while on the Belkin charger. If you're planning to use one of these chargers on a desk or other situation where you'll be interacting with the phone while it's charging, this difference alone is enough to argue for the Belkin in my opinion, as the amount of wobble on the Anker charger is significant.

belkin-qi2-3-in-1-charger.jpg

Looking at the Qi2 phone charging pad itself, the Belkin version has the advantage of an adjustable angle anywhere between fully vertical and fully horizontal, letting you position it however you prefer. The phone pad on the Anker model is at a fixed angle that should work for most people, but the option of adjustments on the Belkin model is a nice feature. The Belkin phone charger also has an understated look with a plain black or white surface matching the base, while the Anker Qi2 charging surface is white on both the black and white model and it has Qi2 branding and "Wireless Power IQ" text on it that makes for a less clean look.

anker-qi2-3-in-1-charger.jpg

Both chargers were able to take an iPhone 15 Pro Max from 30% to ~80% in about an hour, pretty much exactly in line with what I see from Apple's official MagSafe charger. The charging rate starts to slow significantly beyond that to prevent overheating and overcharging, with all three chargers bringing the phone to around 95% after 90 minutes.

When it comes to the Apple Watch charging puck, the Anker and Belkin units are essentially identical, which makes sense considering these parts are sourced from Apple. On both models, the puck itself is white on both black and white color options. I'd love to see some other puck color options from Apple to help third-party manufacturers offer more flexibility in their own color offerings.

Given that these are official Apple Watch modules, they both suffer from one of the common issues some users have complained about with Apple Watch chargers, and that's the fact that the watch has a tendency to rotate while on the charger. While the watch attaches to the charger magnetically, there's nothing offering any rotational stability, so the weight of the watch or band can result in the watch twisting a bit while on the charger.

anker-qi2-3-in-1-charger-sticker.jpg

To its credit, Anker has tried to address this by including a sheet of round stickers that can be placed on the surface of the charging puck to increase friction and reduce the watch's tendency to rotate. This solution does work pretty well, but the sticker is a bit of an eyesore with a tab to facilitate removal hanging over the edge of the puck and a plus-shaped cut in the center of the sticker to allow it to conform to the slightly concave surface of the puck.

The tree-style designs of these chargers means neither one supports Night... Click here to read rest of article

Article Link: Review: Anker and Belkin 3-in-1 Chargers Offer New Qi2 Options for Desk and Nightstand Charging
I have a Belkin tree charger, the previous model, and after about a year the iPhone charger quit working. Belkin sent me a replacement of a cheaper model without MagSafe that lays flat on the desk; not even close to an equivalent product. I probably wouldn’t buy from them again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gumbyhw
I would not be buying any magsafe or wired chargers right now if planning on buying one of the new iPhone Pro models in the Fall. If rumors are true of the faster magsafe charging and corded charging, you charger will already be obsolute. Surprised the companies are rolling out new chargers now.
 
I bought the original Belkin Magsafe "tree" when it came out (it was the only option) and ended up immediately returning it -- it was simply too big. Both of these designs waste a lot of space on my nightstand.
 
We have 2 of the Belkin one and my wife and love it. Haven't had watch rotation issues. Was having problems where it wouldn't charge unless I unplugged it and plugged it back in but that has seemed to be fixed. Only issue is the airpod pros are not always easy to line up. Wish the depression was a little deeper. Very solid build.

I also bought the two when it was heavily discounted FWIW. $150 each was a bit more than should be but glad I have them.
 
Bought two of the Ankers on sale for $80 each for my wife and my bedside tables. So far so good. The watch rotates some, but not crazy. The phone charges a lot faster than my old Anker charger and appreciate everything is integrated (my last one I had to run my watch cord through the device).
 
I’m baffled by how these products are so expensive - Anker is $99 for what? 3 wireless charging coils and a couple magnets?!

Meanwhile, a USB C/ Lightning cable which will charge your phone faster, and cooler, with much higher efficiency is $6.99….
If you were to build similar functionally (charging all three devices wirelessly at the same time) using all Apple products (at full MSRP):

An official Apple MagSafe Charger is $39.99. (You need two, so $79.89.)

An official Apple Watch Charger is $29.99.

An official Apple 20w Power Adapter is $19.99. (You need three, so $59.97.)

So that would be a total of $169.85.

And, of course, that wouldn’t include the cost of a custom made stand to hold all the chargers and keep the wires discretely out of the way. But if you are handy at woodworking, metalworking or such, you can make a nice stand for just the cost of the materials.
 
Last edited:
I’m baffled by how these products are so expensive - Anker is $99 for what? 3 wireless charging coils and a couple magnets?!

Meanwhile, a USB C/ Lightning cable which will charge your phone faster, and cooler, with much higher efficiency is $6.99….
Which also kill your battery health quickly. (I mean wireless charging not the cables)

After switching to MagSafe charging a few years ago now I changed everything back to wired. Together with “limit to 80%” setting my launch day iPhone 15 Pro Max still has 99% battery health now. At the same time last year with the infamous iPhone 14 Pro battery it was already 89%.
 
Last edited:
Why does Belkin have so many of these chargers that look nearly identical? There’s, what, 4 or 5 distinct models of this exact form factor?
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko
Both are very good wireless chargers. Glad to see Qi2 support. Belkin should reduce the cost. $99 price of Anker is much better.
 
I returned three of the Belkin ones.

Couldn't get the watch to sit straight; it just kept swivelling.

I got the flat one instead, and it's much better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zinacef
The great thing about these products is that in a pinch you can rotate the pads up and place candles on them in those situations where you forgot where the candle holder went and you have dinner guests arriving in 5 minutes.

Saved me a few times now, though the wax makes a mess of the stand
 
If you were to build similar functionally (charging all three devices wirelessly at the same time) using all Apple products (at full MSRP):

An official Apple MagSafe Charger is $39.99. (You need two, so $79.89.)

An official Apple Watch Charger is $29.99.

An official Apple 20w Power Adapter is $19.99. (You need three, so $59.97.)

So that would be a total of $169.85.

And, of course, that wouldn’t include the cost of a custom made stand to hold all the chargers and keep the wires discretely out of the way. But if you are handy at woodworking, metalworking or such, you can make a nice stand for just the cost of the materials.
Yeah the MagSafe charger and Apple Watch chargers are also ridiculously over priced for what they are but that is a good way of thinking about it.
 
Which also kill your battery health quickly. (I mean wireless charging not the cables)

After switching to MagSafe charging a few years ago now I changed everything back to wired. Together with “limit to 80%” setting my launch day iPhone 15 Pro Max still has 99% battery health now. At the same time last year with the infamous iPhone 14 Pro battery it was already 89%.
I don’t think there’s any evidence they kill your battery health any quicker than using a regular charger but limiting to 80% will be helping your battery a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MisterSavage
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.