Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

mstgkillr

macrumors regular
Original poster
Feb 11, 2012
237
20
I am a Civil Engineering student and will be using AutoCAD. I already have a RMBP 2.6GHz 512GB 16GB on order but now I am wondering if I should have went for the 2.7GHz processor.

What do you think?
 
It really wont make a reasonable difference. Don't sweat it, keep the 2.6. You are a student, a lot of other students get by with lesser processors. The i7, is as good as it gets for a laptop and 0.1 GHz difference wont matter.
 
I think the answer still applies in the sense that your real-world realization of the bump in processor speed would be so minor that I would go for resolution, especially since the resolution would be great for ACAD.
 
I also study civil engineering (Bauhaus Universität Weimar) we are using Revit (the 3D-Version from AutoCAD using BIM).
I think as student you don't need the 2.6, 2.3 should be enough.
Actually I use a 2.66GHz C2D 2009 MacBook Pro and it can handle Revit and AutoCAD very well. (a lot better than the PCs from the university)

So when you have ordered a 2.6/16/512 - stick with that one, it will be great!
 
Last edited:
don't waste your $

I am a Civil Engineering student and will be using AutoCAD. I already have a RMBP 2.6GHz 512GB 16GB on order but now I am wondering if I should have went for the 2.7GHz processor.

What do you think?

I would of got the 256/16 but if you need 512 and can afford it :D
 
I went with the 2.3, maybe should have opted for the 2.6 hmmm

The main factor between going for the 2.3 vs the 2.6 would be the larger SSD- that's why there's such a huge price delta between the base and 'top' trim models. If you don't need the larger SSD, don't get the 2799 config solely for the slightly faster processor.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.