You certainly can run Intel powered Macs without the battery connected. I am not sure if the same still applies with an M1 Mac. Do note though that even when plugged in an Intel Mac will use the battery as a sort of "capacitor" under heavy use to draw more power than the power outlet provides. Again though, I am not sure if an M1 Mac would do the same. If it does, then your performance will be impacted under heavy load.Can you run the MacBook Air M1 from USB-C power only? I have it partially disassembled and I guess the connector for the batteries is next to the one going to the trackpad? Not 100% sure though ...
Apple’s Intel based laptops run at about 800MHz if there’s no battery. I’d expect something similar from the Apple Silicon ones, but what’s your end goal here?Can you run the MacBook Air M1 from USB-C power only? I have it partially disassembled and I guess the connector for the batteries is next to the one going to the trackpad? Not 100% sure though ...
Well, he's taken it apart to see how it works and probably can't put it fully back together. I used to do same thing with a lot of my toys when I was around 5 or 6. I really wanted to figure out how they work and usually I could not get everything back together sadly, but at least I had satisfied my curiosity. When my parents would ask what I am doing I would reply that I was "fixing" it.Apple’s Intel based laptops run at about 800MHz if there’s no battery. I’d expect something similar from the Apple Silicon ones, but what’s your end goal here?
On all my previous laptops I could remove the batterie which a) saved a few 100 g or more (for traveling and not requiring a battery) b) batteries were one of the first things which died or deteriorated into some mostly useless state.Apple’s Intel based laptops run at about 800MHz if there’s no battery. I’d expect something similar from the Apple Silicon ones, but what’s your end goal here?
I had .... this inner desire ...Why would you take a perfectly good MacBook Air apart and risk destroying it?
Again, it's likely that the computer will run with significantly reduced performance and would be susceptible to unexpected shutdowns if there's more demand for power than the AC adapter provides. There's nothing about this that's a good idea.Actually more or less everything is still in place. In particular the batteries. Not so much some connectors ...
I'll guess I just give it a try, there are not so many connectors which could possibly belong to the battery.
Not sure if trolling... 🤨On all my previous laptops I could remove the batterie which a) saved a few 100 g or more (for traveling and not requiring a battery) b) batteries were one of the first things which died or deteriorated into some mostly useless state.
When I'm home I don't need batteries either which hopefully extends their live.
Admitted the MacBook is a bit different because you at least need to remove some screws and could not just kinda unplug the batterie without disassembly as in case of my earlier notebooks.
I was also thinking about disabling the display and keyboard to save some more energy. Cutting the transistors in half would yield the first 2.5 nm CPU or cutting the CPUs in half would easily double my core count. Overall this would also be more energy efficient. I'll already see myself writing an email to Tim Cook, attached some photos of my modded device, and asking for an internship. Maybe you have some neat ideas too 😘
I had .... this inner desire ...
And it was not that hard. I think it still works. I'll actually never turned it on up to now so I don't even know if it worked before. However, I could always claim it was broken when I got it.
Good grief!On all my previous laptops I could remove the batterie . . .
I was also thinking about disabling the display and keyboard . . . Cutting the transistors in half . . .
I think you are right.Given the OP's screen name, he may be messing with us.
Again, it's likely that the computer will run with significantly reduced performance and would be susceptible to unexpected shutdowns if there's more demand for power than the AC adapter provides. There's nothing about this that's a good idea.
When your battery reaches its max number of cycles and isn't working for you, Apple can replace it for $159. And if you're too cheap to do that, I don't think there's anything stopping you from just keeping it plugged in. Why would you want to physically REMOVE the battery?just curious about the possible future when the time for the batteries inside my MBs has come, as i could live with the fact that i'd only use them plugged in at some point
Well, I guess if you want to save a few bucks by removing the battery in some old-ass laptop as an FU to Apple... I guess go for it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯because, for instance, at some point it will actually become dangerous to keep charging it as the battery could go up in flames when it becomes too old or worn.
It really depends when this time will come though. When it is already old and slow anyway and software support ended, i think it's not really worth bothering with Apple's ****** repair / overhaul practices anymore, despite still being a decent unit for some tasks.