Actually, it was complete scarcasm, which unfortunatly I am not good at conveying via emoticons. I probably should have used a "rolls eyes" face, but what is done is done.
I made that statement because his sentencing was moved up so as to influence the mid-term elections (which fortunatly it did not). Politicians and talking heads are trying to convince the public that the state-murder of one bad man makes the senseless slaughter of 600,000 Iraqis worthwhile. I wish I understood the supposed logic behind this assumption, but this great enlightenment has thus far eluded me.
So please, do not think of me as some mindless idiot who revels in the death of innocent people, or even in one bad man. I am in fact whole-heartedly against state-murder, reguardless of the recipiant. Call me old-fashioned, but I think that forcing someone to rot in prison for a lifetime is a far greater justice than the momentary joy of seeing them hang from the rafters. I added Saddam's planned death to his already deceased countymen becuase I thought it a proper way to highlight the futility of his sentencing. Indeed, this man has been responsible for unspeakable atrocities, but how will killing him bring those that he tortured and killed back? I realize that it is well-argued that capital punishment can bring closure to a victim's kin, and indeed to some it may. However, I firmly believe that prolonged mental anguish is a far greater punishment than momentary torture or death.
600,000 Iraqis
3,000 Americans
...and thats only the dead