Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

VideoNewbie

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Feb 6, 2009
476
6
i just tried to screen cap a square shaped image on a website that is no larger than 300x300. when i tried to overlap both images in photoshop the image i screen capped is about 3 x the size. why?
 
i just tried to screen cap a square shaped image on a website that is no larger than 300x300. when i tried to overlap both images in photoshop the image i screen capped is about 3 x the size. why?

Perhaps it is using the exact resolution that is on the screen.
 
i just tried to screen cap a square shaped image on a website that is no larger than 300x300. when i tried to overlap both images in photoshop the image i screen capped is about 3 x the size. why?

lol :) because the image you are seeing is upscaled 300x300 to 600x600. You have that many pixels.

----------

Perhaps it is using the exact resolution that is on the screen.

exactly. Everything nonretina is upscaled so each nonretina pixels takes up 4 real rendered pixels that get screenshot.
 
Yeah, that's the down side of retina. Its really bad when you do a screen sharing session with someone who's trying to remote your screen via Webex or something. Eat pixels sucka! I also sent someone a screen grab and it was like 8 meg. Awesome.
 
Yeah, that's the down side of retina. Its really bad when you do a screen sharing session with someone who's trying to remote your screen via Webex or something. Eat pixels sucka! I also sent someone a screen grab and it was like 8 meg. Awesome.

Yeah... I wish they made an option to downscale every screencap. My friends are not interested in my awesome 2880*1800 desktop.

edit: I created an automator droplet... Drop an image in, resizes it by 50%. Workaround, still good.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.