Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,917
39,883



The SEC today announced it has charged GT Advanced Technologies and its former CEO Thomas Gutierrez with misleading investors about the company's ability to supply sapphire glass for iPhones. The company is also found to have misclassified more than $300 million in debt to Apple.

gt_advanced_logo_2.jpg

In the fall of 2013, Apple agreed to advance $578 million in four installments to GT in exchange for sapphire glass that met certain technical standards, the SEC says. By late April 2014, GT had failed to meet those standards, resulting in Apple withholding its final $139 million installment and demanding repayment.

On earnings calls in the second quarter of 2014, however, Gutierrez falsely stated that GT expected to hit performance targets and receive the fourth installment payment from Apple by October 2014. GT ended up filing for bankruptcy shortly after, which the SEC says resulted in "significant investor harm."

SEC associate director Anita B. Bandy:
GT and its CEO painted a rosy picture of the company's performance and ability to obtain funding that was paramount to GT's survival while they were aware of information that would have catastrophic consequences for the company. We will continue to hold chief executives accountable when they breach their most fundamental duty to make full and truthful disclosures to investors.
GT later exited bankruptcy and is now privately held.

GT Advanced Technologies was expected to become a major Apple supplier, as it was supposedly able to manufacture extremely thin sheets of sapphire much more cheaply than current methods. For now, Apple continues to source non-sapphire glass from Corning in Kentucky for use in products like the iPhone.

Article Link: Apple's Failed Sapphire Glass Supplier GT Advanced Charged With Misleading Investors
 
Does anyone know where this company was located? I live in Salem MA and I believe thats where they were but it's been a while so I can not recall.
 
Even if the deal with GT worked out, sapphire iPhone screens wouldn’t have been worth what the price increase would’ve probably been. Yeah they wouldn’t have scratched as easily, but they would be more shatter-prone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blackstick
Does anyone know where this company was located? I live in Salem MA and I believe thats where they were but it's been a while so I can not recall.
Mesa, AZ
[doublepost=1556900529][/doublepost]It's now an Apple Data Center
[doublepost=1556900590][/doublepost]
Even if the deal with GT worked out, sapphire iPhone screens wouldn’t have been worth what the price increase would’ve probably been. Yeah they wouldn’t have scratched as easily, but they would be more shatter-prone.
I never looked at their play as screens for iPhones but rather Apple Watch face and camera lens.
 
Even if the deal with GT worked out, sapphire iPhone screens wouldn’t have been worth what the price increase would’ve probably been. Yeah they wouldn’t have scratched as easily, but they would be more shatter-prone.

Tell that to Mohs scale, it scratches at the same level as Gorilla Glass which scratches at level 6 so no benefit.

Here's Zacks scratch test

 
You do realize the screen on the Max is Gorilla Glass right? It's not sapphire glass. That's why it scratches at a level six like Gorilla Glass... cuz it is.;)

Are you serious?

https://www.apple.com/lae/iphone-xs/specs/

The one I'm saying is the camera lens that Apple indicated in the specs as "Sapphire crystal lens cover"
[doublepost=1556901446][/doublepost]
Sapphire is a 9. I’ve had sapphire Apple Watch screens since 2015 and never got a single scratch.

See this video. Same impure Sapphire that scratches at 6.

 
Are you serious?

https://www.apple.com/lae/iphone-xs/specs/

The one I'm saying is the camera lens that Apple indicated in the specs as "Sapphire crystal lens cover"
[doublepost=1556901446][/doublepost]

See this video ‍♂️ , same impure Sapphire that scratches at 6.

Apple deceived the people about it.
They didn’t really put sapphire completely on the lens. It’s a mixture of faux sapphire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marekul
Steve Job's force field he took it with him when he died. Apple is no longer capable of convincing other companies that they can do it look at Intel 5G chips that's a big failure. Good thing Qualcomm is still willing to negotiate and saved Apple's future.
 
Both my Apple Watches scratched on the glass. Luckily, with my first one, the scratch wasn't on an area that affected the image and was able to sell it. The two scratches I have on my current one, I'm not so lucky. The one I have now got scratched putting together a basketball hoop a few months ago. It'll be harder to sell this one.
 
Apple deceived the people about it.
They didn’t really put sapphire completely on the lens. It’s a mixture of faux sapphire.

Apple "deceived" people? Wrong. People just read 2 out of 30 words and then complain about how they were "misled." These same people complain every day about how Facebook should not be able to sell their info, yet still want a free service.
 
Are you serious?

https://www.apple.com/lae/iphone-xs/specs/

The one I'm saying is the camera lens that Apple indicated in the specs as "Sapphire crystal lens cover"
[doublepost=1556901446][/doublepost]

See this video. Same impure Sapphire that scratches at 6.

Ok, fair enough. But in real world use, level 6 is very hard to scratch. Jerry also did a scratch test of the Apple Watch, and while it scratched at level 6, I’ve never had a scratch. Meanwhile, I get scratches on my iPhone all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: k1121j
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.