Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

boxgamex

macrumors newbie
Original poster
May 27, 2008
25
0
While we have all probably seen the video that Kevin Rose posted considering iphone rumors, I think people are going at it wrong.

He said the low end iphone would be $200, which id imagine he meant as the subsidized 8/16gb model, not an iphone nano. He probably didnt mention the subsidy because he is a ****, and forgot.
 
While we have all probably seen the video that Kevin Rose posted considering iphone rumors, I think people are going at it wrong.

He said the low end iphone would be $200, which id imagine he meant as the subsidized 8/16gb model, not an iphone nano. He probably didnt mention the subsidy because he is a ****, and forgot.

Right. Next?!
 
This is where Kevin Rose enters major douche bag status. Folks, just because Kevin Rose said it, doesn't make it true. His rumors are the same rumors we've heard all along...only we didn't make a 30-second douche bag video about it.
 
This is where Kevin Rose enters major douche bag status. Folks, just because Kevin Rose said it, doesn't make it true. His rumors are the same rumors we've heard all along...only we didn't make a 30-second douche bag video about it.

Don't you burst my bubble - Kevin Rose is always right.
 
Pretty much the only thing that makes his video new is the fact that he didn't say it was subsidized.

And I doubt they're going to subsidize it. $199? That's even lower than what they cut the Blackberrys
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.