Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

SGP nano slim glass screen protector

The SLIM ($28) is already 0.26 mm, and the NANO SLIM ($35) is just 0.20 mm? SPIGEN makes great products and all, but sometimes, it's just obvious that they're trying to rip you off.
 
Hmm I have a feeling a tR version will follow. Too bad, new iPhone should be out soon I'm trying not to spend any more on accessories.
 
They will definitely follow it up with tr version.

Waiting for that.

I'm using the original glas.tr and am very happy with it. Only grudge being its heavy...so the nano tr will take care of weight issues for me :)
 
iKaushal said:
They will definitely follow it up with tr version.

Waiting for that.

I'm using the original glas.tr and am very happy with it. Only grudge being its heavy...so the nano tr will take care of weight issues for me :)
Click to expand...

I wouldn't really count on a NANO SLIM Glas.tR. The regular nano slim is already so thin that curved edges might not be possible or even worthwhile.

But on the other hand, I hope they prove me wrong. We need more tempered glass screen protector competition to drive down those prices!
 
RichardC300 said:
I wouldn't really count on a NANO SLIM Glas.tR. The regular nano slim is already so thin that curved edges might not be possible or even worthwhile.

But on the other hand, I hope they prove me wrong. We need more tempered glass screen protector competition to drive down those prices!
Click to expand...

Yeah...but these days a lot of companies are coming in the scene.

Just got an unbranded glass screen protector from china for my wife's S3 from ebay for about $6 and it's awesome in quality. Just like glas.t
 
iKaushal said:
Yeah...but these days a lot of companies are coming in the scene.

Just got an unbranded glass screen protector from china for my wife's S3 from ebay for about $6 and it's awesome in quality. Just like glas.t
Click to expand...

That's some good news. The only comments I've heard on those are they scratch a lot easier, but I'm glad it worked out for your wife!
 
Putting a layer of glass over a layer of glass to protect the under layer of glass. Just seems a bit odd and redundant. Just saying.
 
kaielement said:
Putting a layer of glass over a layer of glass to protect the under layer of glass. Just seems a bit odd and redundant. Just saying.
Click to expand...

It's the same as having a regular screen protector, but it provides the feel of the original screen. I'm not sure why that's hard to understand. If your options to protect your screen are plastic on glass or glass on glass, why not choose glass on glass if you prefer the feel of glass? There's nothing odd or redundant about it.
 
The Flying Kite said:
It's the same as having a regular screen protector, but it provides the feel of the original screen. I'm not sure why that's hard to understand. If your options to protect your screen are plastic on glass or glass on glass, why not choose glass on glass if you prefer the feel of glass? There's nothing odd or redundant about it.
Click to expand...

Well I don't use something that is plastic or glass and it seems to protect very well just saying
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back