Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,592
39,464


Encrypted messaging app Signal has announced it is testing public account usernames so that users don't have to share their phone number to connect through the service.

signal-logo.jpg

Currently, signing up to Signal requires that you share your phone number with other users when connecting with them. While the new method still requires an account to be associated with a number during setup, it is not subsequently shared when contacting other users, making the communication even more private and secure.

According to Signal VP of engineering Jim O'Leary, the username test is currently limited to a separate build in the platform's Staging Environment and remains "pre-beta," so it may cause crashes and other bugs to occur since it fundamentally changes the way that accounts are identified in the Signal ecosystem.

Users who install the build will be able to share their usernames via a QR code or a link, allowing them to use it as a way for others to contact them, no phone number required. There is also an option to turn off phone number discovery in the app under Settings ➝ Privacy ➝ Phone number ➝ Who can find my number.


Signal has been working on usernames since at least 2019, but it is not known when the feature will be ready for primetime. Using the pre-beta build on desktop and iOS today requires some technical knowhow involving code compiling, more information about which can be found in the Signal forums.

Article Link: Signal Tests Sharing Public Usernames in Place of Phone Numbers
 
I tried getting family members into using Signal, but they just didn’t care. iMessage was good enough. So I gave up and haven’t used it since.
 
Oh wow, I’ve never used Signal but I certainly wouldn’t if sharing real phone numbers was required.

Obviously depending on your threat model, you could use a burner number and many people do. Or switch to something like Session or Matrix protocol. However for most users it wasn't an issue. Also privacy != anonymity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maasj and System603
Baffled why more people don't use Signal. It's even more secure than iMessage – not to mention Messenger or WhatsApp.
They're equally "secure" in that everything is E2E encrypted. Signal has self destruct messaging and hides metadata (which Apple doesn't collect anyway) which would be classified more as features than security.

People don't use it because they have to get everyone they want to connect with on it. Where iMessage is already there and ready to go for all iPhone users.
 
They're equally "secure" in that everything is E2E encrypted. Signal has self destruct messaging and hides metadata (which Apple doesn't collect anyway) which would be classified more as features than security.

People don't use it because they have to get everyone they want to connect with on it. Where iMessage is already there and ready to go for all iPhone users.
My understanding is iMessages only meet Signal's security if Advanced Data Protection is enabled on both ends of the conversation (or if iCloud Backups are turned off).

"Standard Protection" means Apple owns the keys to your iCloud Backups which includes your iMessage conversations, and so could be hacked or compelled to retrieve them.

iCloud data security overview - Apple Support
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: maasj and d.o.p.
This will make a great product even better - and it should drive up usage.

Having it linked to your phone number, meant that it was just a more secure cross platform iMessage - that hardly anyone used.
 
I tried getting family members into using Signal, but they just didn’t care. iMessage was good enough. So I gave up and haven’t used it since.
Apple's doing, not your family's. They want exactly this situation to happen across the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maasj
I tried getting family members into using Signal, but they just didn’t care. iMessage was good enough. So I gave up and haven’t used it since.
No regular user has any use for other messaging services. iMessage does more than enough and most like being able to easily identify Android users.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: maasj
I love signal but I have only one very small pet peeve and that’s how it does the “uploading” bar and screen when you share a photo or video.

No other app makes you wait for that screen/or hide it in UI.
 
Hopefully this means we'll eventually be able to use the same Signal account on multiple phones. This is a huge limitation compared to most other messaging platforms.

Yes this! Being tied to one phone is my biggest problem with Signal. My single biggest problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nealibob
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.