Singapore Orders Changes to iMessage by December

[MacRumors]

Singapore has ordered Apple to block or filter messages on iMessage that impersonate government agencies, requiring the company to implement new anti-spoofing protections by December as part of efforts to curb rising online scams, the Straits Times reports.

Singapore's Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said that it had issued an Implementation Directive to Apple under the Online Criminal Harms Act, instructing the company to prevent iMessage accounts and group chats from using names that mimic Singapore government agencies or the "gov.sg" sender ID. The directive also applies to Google Messages, with both companies required to comply by November 30.

MHA said the order was necessary because iMessage does not currently support the safeguards built into Singapore's registered SMS sender ID system. Since July 2024, legitimate messages sent by Singapore government agencies through traditional SMS channels have used the "gov.sg" sender ID to help the public verify authenticity.

Messages sent via iMessage, however, do not pass through the same ID registry and therefore allow scammers to present themselves using identical or near-identical identifiers. The ministry cited more than 120 police reports in which scammers impersonated registered sender IDs.

As part of the directive, Apple must now ensure that profile names of unknown iMessage senders are either not displayed or are shown less prominently than the phone numbers associated with the account. Authorities said this requirement is intended to give users a clearer view of the identity information least susceptible to manipulation. Messages or group chats that appear to spoof government identifiers must either be blocked entirely or filtered so that recipients do not see them.

Apple's compliance will require changes to iMessage's display logic and name-handling behavior in Singapore, creating an exception to the platform's long-standing reliance on unverified user-defined sender names in one-to-one and group messaging threads. iMessage does not currently use a sender ID registry or external name verification scheme, and the new rules mark one of the first instances of a government requiring compulsory filtering for specific categories of display names within Apple's messaging ecosystem.

The MHA said Apple and Google have indicated that they will comply with the directive. If they fail to implement the mandated controls, the companies could face penalties.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: Singapore Orders Changes to iMessage by December

 

[Ev0d3vil]

Good, im from Singapore and im getting way too many scam calls sometimes.

 

[psingh01]

I’m sure a lot of work will get done on this during a holiday week.

 

[hieranonymous]

This actually seems like a good government mandate, for a change.

 

[Radin.Y]

This is one of those situations Government asking a private company to do something is 100% reasonable.

 

[britboyj]

Sure but... By November 30th?

For a country with a large tech and finance footprint, that is a laughably zealous implementation of what is a technology solution requirement that ostensibly impacts the entire platform globally.

 

[Hajj.david]

I agree 100% with the mandate however there is likely a holiday code freeze making this an unreasonable ask given the time. Typically there is a two week turn around time for code changes for testing etc. We have what, 5 days?

 

[HQuest]

Sensible ask. This, potentially, could be leveraged to other countries. Not a SG citizen but I appreciate this.

 

[Paddle1]

26.1.1 incoming?

 

[WarmWinterHat]

I don't get scam/telemarketer calls very often anymore, but I sure do get a lot of SMS and iMessage spam.

Luckily most is filtered out, but dang..... I don't know what Apple can do, when it comes from an iMessage email address.

 

[surferfb]

Agree with most here; sensible request, although hopefully Apple had more of a heads up to get it implemented that today.

 

[kemal]

Block or filter messages? Aren't iMessage messages encrypted in such a way that Apple can't read them?

 

[ikramerica]

Did any of these countries ever hold their public or quasi-private phone companies equally responsible for scam telephone calls?

 

[EM2013]

Finally something beneficial. Spam calls and texts are ridiculous, even with silence unknown callers

 

[iPrabhu]

Shouldn't this be implemented by the companies when their servers (iMessages in Apple's case) are used to transmit the communication, without govt mandating it?

 

[Starfia]

What strikes me about this report – especially in the context of this decade's news – is that the process here doesn't appear to be an act of law; it looks more like it's just a government marshalling its case and communicating what they want to the companies directly, perhaps allowing for a little dialogue in pursuit of refining the sensibleness of whatever is implemented. It shines a light on the clunkiness of the popular process of writing protracted bills and expecting everything to go smoothly.

I haven't used phone service in ages, so I don't know: does iMessage's recent feature for initially hiding messages from unknown contacts essentially take care of this anyway?

 

[ProbablyDylan]

Reasonable and agreeable request with an unreasonable and hilarious implementation timeline.

 

[ProbablyDylan]

I haven't used phone service in ages, so I don't know: does iMessage's recent feature for initially hiding messages from unknown contacts essentially take care of this anyway?

It does, but it is possible that legitimate government messages could get caught by the spam filter. This request doesn't appear to be intended to address the spam issue - rather, it's about being able to reliably tell where a message was sent from.

 

[John.B]

How many scams are from WhatsApp/Meta vs. literally all other platforms?

 

[Starfia]

It does, but it is possible that legitimate government messages could get caught by the spam filter. This request doesn't appear to be intended to address the spam issue - rather, it's about being able to reliably tell where a message was sent from.

Right, I think I perceived that but then started to rationalize about it. I think I had the idea that enabling "hide messages from unknown contacts" amounts to a conscious choice by a user that they intend to occasionally check those messages and inspect the sender's information, which seemingly already is a reliable way to tell where a message was sent from. So I suppose this is more about some proactive, specific, non-user mechanism to reduce the likelihood that users will slip up there.

(I have to say, this is leading me to curiosity about the practicality of this – I've never even heard of direct messages from governments to citizens. Is Singapore's government just chatty like that…?)

 

[retroneo]

I've never even heard of direct messages from governments to citizens

Tax, fines, car registration, health reimbursement, health records, weather warnings, education logging, compulsory savings etc.

And I'm not in Singapore

 

[frownface]

Seems like a perfectly reasonable request. Heck i hope this goes live worldwide.
If this sytem went live in april; then apple would've been aware of it since at least then.

Whether or not they've been formally asked to conform prior to this latest notice we may never know; but from my experience with the sg govt they're incredibly on the ball, so i'd expect that they would've.

This latest might be final notice.

 

[Rafagon]

Who does Singapore think it is?

These are the people who caned an American youth for "vandalizing" a few cars.

 

[-BigMac-]

I haven't used phone service in ages, so I don't know: does iMessage's recent feature for initially hiding messages from unknown contacts essentially take care of this anyway?

Eh what? 👀

You have your phone in constant Airplane mode/No Sim, and are living all day everyday in wifi range?

 

[Starfia]

Tax, fines, car registration, health reimbursement, health records, weather warnings, education logging, compulsory savings etc.

And I'm not in Singapore

!

May I ask where you are?