So, I thought I'd shoot off a message to steve about stacks...

[ph0rk]

This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:

 Message-id: <0FDE47FF-7C25-4AFB-B61A-D6D6D9E63398@email.unc.edu>
 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:17:09 -0400
 From: XXXXXXXXXXXX
 To: steve@mac.com
 Subject: stacks and hierarchical folders in Leopard

Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:

 Recipient address: steve@mac.com
 Reason: Over quota

Whoops.

 

[xUKHCx]

There is a reason for the feedback pages.

 

[chriswheat]

Also, "his" address is sjobs@apple.com.

 

[ph0rk]

There is a reason for the feedback pages.

A quick perusal of the support pages failed to yield the feedback page and I didn't feel like devoting more time to it, thanks. In 20 years I've never disliked a change enough to give feedback about it. However, if they haven't said anything about hierarchical folders yet I doubt they'll do so soon, anyway.

Still, you'd think the email address attached to his "resume" would have unlimited quota; whether or not it is his primary address. (It could be an alias. I have lots of those.)


Edit: Come to think of it, I rather doubt sjobs@apple.com is seen by his eyes unfiltered - probably the same staffers that read steve@mac.com.