Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Stocktrader

macrumors member
Original poster
Oct 28, 2007
85
0
Always thought the bottleneck was AT&T's 3G network and not the iPhone hardware. If that is the case, would the faster 3GS iPhone BE faster if it's still waiting on the AT&T network or am I missing something?

Thanks
 
Always thought the bottleneck was AT&T's 3G network and not the iPhone hardware. If that is the case, would the faster 3GS iPhone BE faster if it's still waiting on the AT&T network or am I missing something?

Thanks

The bottleneck isn't the network.

The rendering of web-pages and other actions is limited by the CPU in the device. The 3G network is delivering data faster than the iPhone's ability to draw it.

Compare iPhone on WiFi versus your desktop on the same WiFi. The desktop is faster right?

The 3GS has a faster CPU. So pretty much everything will be faster.

C.
 
In most areas, yeah, you're restricted by the AT&T network. This 3G has some pretty nice speeds if you can ever find an area that gives you what the hardware is capable of achieving.
 
The 3GS also has a faster 3G connection, but for AT&T customers it won't make a difference at the moment until AT&T rolls out some upgraded towers.
 
I think It will be slightly faster, but with our 3g here behaving as badly as it does, who knows.

I'm mostly excited about having faster browsing on wi-fi
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.