Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

edesignuk

Moderator emeritus
Original poster
Mar 25, 2002
19,232
2
London, England
12oct09_spiderpill.jpg


Endoscopy, or the examination of a person's bowels via a tube-mounted camera, is not exactly the most pleasant medical procedure one could undergo. In 2004, we noted the early stages of a project to alleviate the (literal) pain of the procedure with a spider pill, which -- once swallowed by the hopefully willing patient -- can be remotely controlled and positioned inside the human body. Yes, it's a tiny, wirelessly communicating robot with a camera for a head crawling inside you. Hit the read link for the full BBC report, it really is worth seeing, and start your Innerspace jokes ... now!
Engadget [BBC video]

wow. Impressive...if a little creepy.
 
Wirelessly posted (Nokia 5800 Tube XpressMusic : Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; U; Series60/5.0 Nokia5800d-1/21.0.101; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413)

*puts away the latex gloves for a second*

Uh...where's the fun in this? :confused:
 
Hope that photo isn't "actual size"! :eek:

I'm in a high-risk group for bowel cancer (sister was diagnosed with it a few years back, but responded really well to treatment); and should have regular colonscopic screenings but am far too much of a chicken.

This device actually looks a lot more ..err.. palatable. Hope it hits the mainstream soon.
 
Hope that photo isn't "actual size"! :eek:

I'm in a high-risk group for bowel cancer (sister was diagnosed with it a few years back, but responded really well to treatment); and should have regular colonscopic screenings but am far too much of a chicken.

This device actually looks a lot more ..err.. palatable. Hope it hits the mainstream soon.


Experience with virtual colonoscopy (via CT scanner) as well as PillCam has shown that even if this technology becomes available in the US, insurance companies are unlikely to pay for it. The main source of their concern is that it's technology that is not better than conventional colonoscopy, and even if the camera identifies a polyp, tumor, or inflammation, it can't take a biopsy and that patient will need a colonoscopy anyway.

Somewhere between 30% and 50% of patients undergoing colonscopy have polyps. That means that 30% - 50% of patients getting that little camera doodad are going to need both procedures.

I'm pretty confident that this thing won't ever fly and will never achieve broad-based use.
 
at least by the looks of it, it seems that the arms fold down into the side when you swallow it.

After seeing how much pain my cousin went through with various stomach scopes etc, this thing looks very appealing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.