joetronic said:do you think we need something like this here? Sounds like it would be a good idea to go over a few things. If this has already been posted i apologize, a search came up empty.
liketom said:why ? your not saying macrumors is like spymac are you lol
![]()
Mr. Anderson said:Was there anything specific you were concerned about?
D
yellow said:With the influx of new mods, things have been pretty clean.
michaelrjohnson said:But along those lines, MR has always been moderated very well.
No, I didn't think it was. It was just a positive comment.yellow said:Ah, it wasn't a dig at the mods, it was more a dig at the sheer volume of posts. Mainly that it's understandably difficult to be able to keep up with all that (spam and whatnot) in a timely fashion. With the addition of some new blood, there's more warm bodies to fill the gap.
michaelrjohnson said:"If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all."
Indeed. And I hope with the next version of their site they get the idea that sometimes less is more (cliché, I know; forgive me?).mac-er said:Spymac went to crap about 3 years ago...