No camera because people do not want it 
http://gizmodo.com/5355959/steve-jobs-gives-his-reasons-for-lack-of-camera-in-ipod-touch
http://gizmodo.com/5355959/steve-jobs-gives-his-reasons-for-lack-of-camera-in-ipod-touch
Customers started to tell us, "You don't know what you've got here - it's a great game machine, with the multitouch screen, the accelerometer, and so on."
We started to market it that way, and it just took off. And now what we really see is it's the lowest-cost way to the App Store, and that's the big draw. So what we were focused on is just reducing the price to $199. We don't need to add new stuff - we need to get the price down where everyone can afford it.
Seriously?
It's kind of hard to believe that is actually coming from Steve Jobs.
Steve Jobs never said people don't want flash players. What he said was that cheap (under $100) flash-based players don't hold enough songs to be useful and end up getting thrown in a drawer.People don't want...Flash players
100% sure they will have it in the 4th gen.![]()
I just find it very strange that the Nano has significant built-in features (FM Radio and camera) that the Touch and the Classic don't have.
Hahaha Steve Jobs needs a brain transplant next...
(too soon?)![]()
True, I would've been a potential buyer if it had a camera and maybe a different back that wouldn't scratch so damn easy......why not have it now?
Apple totally missed a marketing oppurtunity! They lost my money...
I am now interested in the Zune HD and the Creative Zii Egg![]()