Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPod touch Still photos?
- Thread starter TorontoLRT
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Both cams take low res stills as well as video. The back cam is apparently 960 x 720, and the front is VGA.
http://www.apple.com/ipodtouch/specs.html
http://www.apple.com/ipodtouch/specs.html
It takes still photos
"Point and shoot.
An awesome view. A decked-out cupcake. Your dog looking unbearably cute. If you want to take a quick photo to upload to your Facebook page, either camera on iPod touch can also capture stills. Just tap on the screen to adjust exposure. Then post to Facebook and let the comments begin."
"Point and shoot.
An awesome view. A decked-out cupcake. Your dog looking unbearably cute. If you want to take a quick photo to upload to your Facebook page, either camera on iPod touch can also capture stills. Just tap on the screen to adjust exposure. Then post to Facebook and let the comments begin."
Photos stills?
anyone know how many megapixels that ipod takes?? Does VGA suck compared to megapixels in image stills?
I was looking forward to the ipod touch taking photos that what i really wanted
anyone know how many megapixels that ipod takes?? Does VGA suck compared to megapixels in image stills?
I was looking forward to the ipod touch taking photos that what i really wanted
I might be in the minority, but I'm fine with the relatively low-res still cam on the back. I'm happy it's got a back cam at all. If I want to take quality photos for anything that matters, I'll use my real camera. I'm just psyched about the HD video, cause the iPhone video was pretty nice.
It should be fine for the purpose intended, the Nintendo DSi only has a 0.3 MP camera and people still use it. It will be fine for those in the moment pictures, which is what this will be used for. I have a digital camera too so if I want to take pics of things that matter, I would use that.
I also assume this can be used for apps, like barcode scanning, which is what I really wanted it for.
Honestly I think we should be happy it got a rear camera. Lets face it they could have given us just a facetime camera (somehow) and people would have still bought the device. Heck people would buy the device regardless of what apple does. After last year's update, I am satisfied.
I also assume this can be used for apps, like barcode scanning, which is what I really wanted it for.
Honestly I think we should be happy it got a rear camera. Lets face it they could have given us just a facetime camera (somehow) and people would have still bought the device. Heck people would buy the device regardless of what apple does. After last year's update, I am satisfied.
Hmmm... last year's nano camcorder would've also been sufficient. If I want to take quality HD video for anything that matters, I'll use my real camcorder.
Sound familiar?