Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

SaarM

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Aug 26, 2017
2
0
Iam about to purcahse the new MBP my usings is adobe programs PS Primere LightRoom And illustrairtor..
also Final cut.. Iam a photographer so i will probably will have an external storage anyways.. I have no prob to carry this with me all the time.. I dont find it annoying.

The qustion is what should I buy? I thought about the 13" NO TouchBar 256 GB with 16 gigs of Ram..

Or maybe the 13 touchbar 512 GB which is stronger Processor but with 8 gigs of ram..

Whould like to hear your thoughts..

Thanks alot
Saar
 
Last edited:
Just got this myself - 13" NO TouchBar 256 GB with 16 gigs of Ram.

Based on feedback from others, Touch Bar is not worth the hype.
 
Just got this myself - 13" NO TouchBar 256 GB with 16 gigs of Ram.

Based on feedback from others, Touch Bar is not worth the hype.

Are you heavy user of graphic programs? are you satisfied with this purcahse ?
 
Aside from recommending the 15" over the 13" (more powerful GPU, larger screen size for when you are displaying on an external monitor, e.g. on the road, etc), if you are still set on the smaller, less powerful 13", I have to encourage you to go for 16Gb RAM with 512Gb - this gives you plenty more power and internal storage for the future even if you aren't currently making use of it right now. Think beyond your current requirements even if it requires you to save up a few $$$ to pay for it.
 
Are you heavy user of graphic programs? are you satisfied with this purcahse ?

I just placed the order the other night. Upgrading from MacBook Air 2014. I am an average user and do not use many graphic programs. The main highlight for me is the screen. I do a lot of writing for work and I decided to invest my money where my times goes.
 
Once you have settled on a class (i.e. nTB, TB, or 15"), there is little benefit to upgrading the CPU. In other words, spend your money on RAM or SSD upgrade rather than CPU.
 
I have to concur with the previous sentiment, RAM or SSD vs a faster CPU. A faster CPU will shave some seconds off tasks, but running out of local space or juggling multiple apps/tasks can be a detriment to the user experience. A CPU upgrade would be worth it in the financial sense for someone who makes a living out of intensive professional work, because time=money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Patcell
Been a while since I used Adobe products, and I haven't used the latest versions of their software... but if I remember right, those things hog quite a lot of memory, so I'd focus more on getting as much RAM as possible if I were you.

(No idea if their latest software supports the TouchBar or not... would it really make a big difference though?)
 
Here’s my quick story. A month ago I decided on the 2017 Kaby Lake 13” vs 15” because of portability. Then it was TB or NTB. The TB had a more powerful processor and it was pretty cool. I ordered ordered a 16/512. Unfortunately, the keyboard keys were really mushy and two of the four USB-C ports did not positively hold a cable. There was no “click” when you plugged in a cable. This caused cables or thumb drives to slip out. I gave it a few days and called Apple for a replacement. I noticed right away, after Spotlight was done indexing, that the battery life was only so-so. The second 13” MBP arrived and the keyboard difference was night and day. It felt second-gen. I checked the ports and right off the bat one of the ports had the same issue. BTW, I brought both computers to the Apple Store to see if they could adjust or fix it. They said since it was within 14 days to send it back for a replacement. Again, I used it for a few days before I sent it back. Everything was great, but the TB was not as cool as I thought and it was more of a pain to hit the ESC key or adjust brightness and volume. I’m sure it will get better once it is better integrated with all the software. It just didn’t seem that intuitive to me. But that’s just for me. I read some reviews and found that the TB MBP has a slightly smaller battery and the TB and its processor and the 3.1GHz i5, take more power, than the NTB 2.3GHz model. I decided this time to switch to the NTB 13” 16/512. It was perfect! The dedicated function keys felt normal, the keyboard was great, the ports worked as they should, the speed was great. I didn’t notice any difference in day to day speed at all. Now I don’t encode videos or do any CPU tasking activities regularly...just MS Office, Netflix, iTunes , YouTube, email, etc. What I did notice is the awesome battery life. It’s stays at 100% for a long time. Sometimes I wonder if the battery gauge is working. I do use Parallels Desktop 13 and Windows 10. Sometimes I leave it in Coherence mode and the battery life is still good despite running Windows as VM. I do hear the fan spin up occasionally, but it is definitely nothing to worry about. If you don’t need the quad core processor of the 15” then the 2.3GHz 16/512 should work great. Battery life is impressive!!
 
Been a while since I used Adobe products, and I haven't used the latest versions of their software... but if I remember right, those things hog quite a lot of memory, so I'd focus more on getting as much RAM as possible if I were you.

(No idea if their latest software supports the TouchBar or not... would it really make a big difference though?)
I'm not a heavy user but they were running well on a 2016 13" 8/512 I had. Using less than 4GB of RAM much of the time.
 
I think you should favor storage and RAM. Video files are large. The internal SSD on the MacBook is insanely fast and does a good job with both compressible and incompressible data. This is good for working with larger media files.

Getting an external SSD that is even remotely close in speed to the MBP's internal SSD costs a fortune - often more than upgrading the internal storage from the start, plus it often means a large enclosure that requires an outlet. Portable SATA SSDs work for many Users, but if often working with large files then the difference between SATA and NVMe can be significant, IMO.
 
My personal choice is SSD RAM CPU. In that Order. Because I am a photographer as well and want to keep my photos on my mac for convenient backups using time machine
 
Of course it all comes down to what your budget allows but I would tend to always have a minimum 16Gb / 512Gb setup these days - if I couldn't afford to hit yes to the fastest possible CPU, then it would be RAM > SSD > CPU, especially in a non-upgradeable hardware path such as a MBP.
 
Iam a photographer so i will probably will have an external storage anyways.

I thought about the 13" NO TouchBar 256 GB with 16 gigs of Ram..

512 GB which is stronger Processor but with 8 gigs of ram..

Since you'll have an external drive with you, I'd the 512GB of storage is superfluous, I'd go for the 16GB.

Why opt for the No Touchbar model? I think the TB equipped 13" offers faster processors?
 
I went with the TB model when I ordered mine, but only because I typically use 3 or more connections at a time at work. I didn't want to have to juggle having only 2 ports.

I think the TB is a bit gimmicky, but I'm sure once I get used to it, it will be fine. Plus I was deciding between 15 and 13 and all 15 had TB so once the 13 arrives it will just seeing if down sizing the screen will be ok for me. This is my primary machine, but it travels with me daily so the smaller footprint is what got me to order the 13
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.