Classroom Disruption
Classroom disruption has been viewed as being likely to substantially or repeatedly interfere with the conduct of class. Examples include, but are not limited to, repeated, unauthorized use of a cell phone during class time; persistent speaking without being recognized, pagers beeping, inappropriate or disrespectful comments to professors or other students, or making physical threats to either professors or other students.
Faculty may discourage classroom disruption by stating reasonable expectations in advance as well as in the class syllabus. Both the underlying reasons for the expectations and the consequences of disruptions may be included in the syllabus. Key factors in responding to classroom disruptions are clear expectations, courtesy and fairness in response and progressive discipline.
How to respond when a classroom disruption occurs:
Faculty may consider a general word of caution, such as “there are too many private conversations going on during the lecture, let’s focus on the topic.” If the behavior is irritating, but not disruptive, faculty may speak to the student after class making the student aware of such distractions. If the behavior is disrupting class, faculty may correct the student in a courteous manner, indicating further discussion can occur after class. Disruptive behavior needs to be addressed before it becomes an ongoing incident.
Persistent disruptions:
A student who persistently disrupts class may be directed by faculty to leave the classroom for the remainder of the class period. The student should be given reason(s) for such action and an opportunity to discuss the matter as soon as practicable.
When to call the police:
Faculty may call the campus police when there is any threat of violence or other unlawful behavior to the student him/herself, to other students or to the academic faculty. Also, a student’s refusal to leave class after being told to do so is grounds for calling the police.
Faculty may keep written records of all alleged classroom disruptions, including date, time and disruptive behavior.
The disruptive student should receive progressive disciplinary action:
Faculty may ask the student to stop the disruptive behavior and warn the student that further disruption can result in student disciplinary action.
If the student continues the disruptive behavior despite a warning, faculty may then ask the student to leave and may inform the student that the incident will be referred for disciplinary action.
If the student then refuses to leave the area after being instructed to do so, faculty may inform the student that refusal may be deemed a separate violation of the Student Code of Conduct.
If the student persists in the disruptive behavior and refuses to leave, then the faculty may call the campus police.
Disruptive behavior is a direct violation of the Student Code of Conduct.
Daniel S. Cummins
Director, University Judicial Affairs
University of Cincinnati