Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Interesting that his official date of death is in 1952, which varies greatly from the generally accepted year of 1947. ...

Not really. Its one of those legalese paperwork things. Last "documentation" of his being alive + 5 year waiting period = official DOD of 1952. A formal legal "certification" of his death was needed by the trust.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
Not really. Its one of those legalese paperwork things. Last "documentation" of his being alive + 5 year waiting period = official DOD of 1952. A formal legal "certification" of his death was needed by the trust.

Exactly.

Nobody in Sweden had forgotten what had happened to Raoul Wallenberg, and it has been understood for decades that he had died.

However, the necessity to issue a formal death cert is probably a legal requirement before certain other matters to do with the trust can be proceeded with, or attended to.
 
I liked the movie, thought Spielberg did a good job on it.

Fair enough.

However, I think I more closely align with our mutual friend @Shrink on the topic of Mr Spielberg; in general, I have come to realise that - with the possible exception of E.T. which I did like, it is charming - but, then, I do like space stuff - I don't actually much like his movies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamesMike
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.