Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ZEEN0j

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Sep 29, 2014
1,576
731
In short. He wants a macbook I want a imac. What I wonder is will I notice some kind of downgrade in performance? Or are they pretty equal. I don't play games on mac.

I want programs to open instantly, they do on my macbook. Unpacking files and transferring files should be fast. I haven't been able to test his mac since he lives in another country. The only once I've tried are the default configuration in the apple store with a 5400rpm drive and 8GB ram. And they're slower than my macbook in opening programs. I'm doing the switch either way, I just want to know.

I have a Macbook Pro mid 2012 15" (non retina)

CPU: 2,3 Ghz Intel Core i7 quad core (turbo boost 3,3 Ghz) L3 Cache 6 MB
Memory: 16GB 1600mhz
Storage: 500GB ssd
GPU: Intel HD graphics 4000 and Nvidia GT650M 512MB GDDR5
Screen: 1440x900

He has a iMac 21,5" 2014

CPU: 2,7 Ghz Intel Core i5 quad core (turbo boost 3,2 Ghz) L3 Cache 4MB
Memory: 16GB 1600mhz
Storage: 1TB fusion drive
GPU: Intel Iris pro graphics
Screen 1920x1080

thanks
 
In short. He wants a macbook I want a imac. What I wonder is will I notice some kind of downgrade in performance? Or are they pretty equal. I don't play games on mac.

I want programs to open instantly, they do on my macbook. Unpacking files and transferring files should be fast. I haven't been able to test his mac since he lives in another country. The only once I've tried are the default configuration in the apple store with a 5400rpm drive and 8GB ram. And they're slower than my macbook in opening programs. I'm doing the switch either way, I just want to know.

I have a Macbook Pro mid 2012 15" (non retina)

CPU: 2,3 Ghz Intel Core i7 quad core (turbo boost 3,3 Ghz) L3 Cache 6 MB
Memory: 16GB 1600mhz
Storage: 500GB ssd
GPU: Intel HD graphics 4000 and Nvidia GT650M 512MB GDDR5
Screen: 1440x900

He has a iMac 21,5" 2014

CPU: 2,7 Ghz Intel Core i5 quad core (turbo boost 3,2 Ghz) L3 Cache 4MB
Memory: 16GB 1600mhz
Storage: 1TB fusion drive
GPU: Intel Iris pro graphics
Screen 1920x1080

thanks


From the looks of it the two machines should be just about the same. The iMac has some slightly lower specs but it's 2 years newer. The CPU on both are similar, the hard drives will feel very similar because a fusion drive is almost as fast as a SSD for most uses and you will double your storage which is a plus. Graphics should be better but I can't say for sure, someone else can back me up on that. Regardless of speed you are stepping up in machine resale value as well.
 
Yeah the SSD on your MBP will feel slightly, and I mean only slightly faster at opening applications.
Overall an equal trade or even you are coming out just slightly ahead.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.