The main reason stated in the article is that it is cheaper to maintain two systems than one...And that they can't get the information systems software they want compatible with OS X.
So here's an idea!! Get NEW information systems software (compatible with OS X) and stick with the platform that offers LOWER MAINTENANCE COSTS. It's called "Saving in the Long Run."
I expected that someone would talk about how students needed to know how to use Windows because that's what the real world used. But no one did. Probably because Windows has now done SUCH a good job at ripping off the Mac that no one can say that the migration from Mac to Windows would really cause all that many problems.
But this is the best quote from the article:
"It worries me that I'm going to have to run around and patch machines," said Donna Hall, librarian information specialist at Douglas L. Jamerson Elementary School in St. Petersburg, which has 218 Apple computers and four personal computers."
218 Apple computers and four personal computers? The guy who wrote it is an IDIOT. Who doesn't know that the term 'PC' when referred to as a platform, DOES NOT MEAN PERSONAL COMPUTER?!!
When PC means personal computer, it is referring to Macs, Windows-based computers, Linux-based, BeOS-based, toothpick-based, whatever.
This is actually a serious issue. The more uneducated people who write like this, the more people think that Macs are SO different that they aren't even personal computers.
Imbeciles like this should be ripped a new one.