Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

user1690

macrumors regular
Original poster
Feb 13, 2011
146
6
Searching....
-Previous Information Removed, current information below-

Backstory: I wanted a Tape Drive backup solution and i had asked the MacRumours Forums members for some assistance in what would work, and what wouldnt.




Heres what i have, what worked, and what didnt;

1.) Sony SDX-460V (AIT1-Turbo IDE Drive)

2.) Sony StorStation Firewire/USB External Tape Drive (AIT2-Turbo ver.)

2.) (Software/Driver) IOSCSI 0.1 Driver for PowerPC Architecture

3.) (Software/Driver) BRU PE (30Day Demo)

4.) (Software/Driver) BRU LE (30Day Demo)

5.) (Software/Driver) Retrospect Express


SDX-460V
This Drive works with both the IOSCSI driver and the BRU PE software (Not with both installed together though due to how they access the drive. (RST0 for IOSCSI and ntape0 for BRU PE). Because the drive can be set to compress files via its own hardware, no compression in software settings was needed (BRU PE).

When testing with the IOSCSI driver, basic manipulation was able to be done. I was able to write files to the tape and then retrieve them, i was also able to rewind the tape but not eject it, i was also able to change the block size. Writing files to the tape was a bit iffy at times. Trying to write to tape without the SUDO command didnt work and the terminal would always report "Function not implemented!". Even using the sudo command, running it first time failed (With above error) but running it again right after worked.

Using the BRU PE software, things were a bit easier as no terminal was needed, the GUI interface interpreted the commands for me. I was able to manipulate the drive fully (Write, Read/Extract from Tape, Verify, Rewind, Eject, Block size changes).


Sony StorStation Firewire/USB External Tape Drive (AIT2-Turbo ver.)

This drive, just like the internal AIT-1 Turbo worked effortlessly with the BRU PE software. Unfortunately i could not test with the BRU LE version because the GUI appeared to be hard-coded to refuse to launch if more than 1 tape drive was present and since it was detecting the internal IDE drive first that is all it would accept or it would force quit itself. I did however test the drive via the Terminal since BRU LE had functionality to access both drives that way. I had to enter long commands and state each file i wanted to backup and to which drive (in this case; ntape1). The downside to this was that, even though the file was big enough for an 80GB native capacity tape, it still reached the end of the tape before all the file was on. I think this may have been either a block size issue or data transfer speed problem resulting in alot of blank tape being wasted. (FireWire 400, surely fast enough?).

I didnt test this drive too much yet with IOSCSITape beyond it being detected by the driver

Using Retrospect Express was dissapointing, i was not able to set a block size that would work so, files that would all get onto tape in the BRU softwares, would not in retrospect express. (So, for example if a whole 39GB DMG went on 1 tape in BRU softwares, in Retrospect Express more than 1 tape was needed). This was confusing
 
Last edited:
all i know is that when i had a tape drive the tapes themselves cost more than a firewire hard drive.
 
Get yourself a 72GB DAT72 tape for $13.50 and try it out.

You need the IOSCSITape package (may or may not work on PPC).

First, you need to rewind that tape:
Code:
mt -f /dev/rst0 rewind
Tapes are written with tar (tape archive):
Code:
tar cf /dev/rst0 /
And also read (rewind first, obviously):
Code:
cd /whereever
mt -f /dev/rst0 rewind
tar xf /dev/rst0

It doesn't mount because it's not supposed to do that. You can only access the data sequentially, not randomly like a hard drive (well, you could, but you'd have access times measured in 10s of seconds).

If you want to be all Macintoshy, you could also cat DMGs to and from the tape instead, or anything else that consists of 0s and 1s for that matter.

Bottomline: Just backup to dropbox, alright.
 
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Get yourself a 72GB DAT72 tape for $13.50 and try it out.

You need the IOSCSITape package (may or may not work on PPC).

First, you need to rewind that tape:
Code:
mt -f /dev/rst0 rewind
Tapes are written with tar (tape archive):
Code:
tar cf /dev/rst0 /
And also read (rewind first, obviously):
Code:
cd /whereever
mt -f /dev/rst0 rewind
tar xf /dev/rst0

It doesn't mount because it's not supposed to do that. You can only access the data sequentially, not randomly like a hard drive (well, you could, but you'd have access times measured in 10s of seconds).

If you want to be all Macintoshy, you could also cat DMGs to and from the tape instead, or anything else that consists of 0s and 1s for that matter.

Bottomline: Just backup to dropbox, alright.

Thanks for that information Giuly, my initial plan is to make a backup containing all my basic software/files and then leave it for whenever its needed. (Like a base-backup with the essentials, saving time if i ever need to re-install whole OS) Tape seems to be able to accomplish that while also being able to keep all my data 'whole' for quite a long period of time.

What i'd specifically like to know now is, what would the command be to do this; Copy a .DMG file directly to the tape via terminal?
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Hey guys!

I'm just wondering if anyone has experience with Tape drive's in PowerMac G4 systems? (Specifically MDD systems).

Specifically, the tape drive is a HP DW026A. It connects via USB internally which is ok because i have a USB card installed with 1 internal port.
What i'd like to know is, if this drive (or any tape drive actually, that is internal) will work right away without any driver installs and if, when i insert a tape, if it will mount to the desktop immediately or if i have to run specific software. The drive will only be used for system-wide backups of the main Hard drive.


Any information is appreciated. :D

Let's not kid around. Who uses that crap still? Anything tape is dated and uncool.
 
Let's not kid around. Who uses that crap still? Anything tape is dated and uncool.

Many large businesses and organizations use tape backs. It's still a better alternative than havingany hard drives. Google, Amazon, and Apple all backup their cloud data on tape. My work place uses tapes as well. They look about the size and shape of VHS tapes.
 
Many large businesses and organizations use tape backs. It's still a better alternative than havingany hard drives. Google, Amazon, and Apple all backup their cloud data on tape. My work place uses tapes as well. They look about the size and shape of VHS tapes.

Dude that's so weird! It just sounds so ancient! You'd think someone would have invented something better by now...
 
Dude that's so weird! It just sounds so ancient! You'd think someone would have invented something better by now...

There honestly isn't anything better than a nice VHS sized tape for long term remote storage. They can take abuse better than a hard drive and are much bigger than a SSD. Plus, the the tapes are really cheap. The ones where I work store about 20-50GB depending on the settings used. They apparently have records going back into the 90's on similar tapes at some IronMountain place.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.