Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

douglasf13

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Jul 2, 2010
1,782
1,083
Hi. It seems that there has been a lot of confusion as to the size of the Apple Watch, because Apple only gave us the dimension of the case from top to bottom, rather than the more common diameter of the case from left to right that we're used to seeing with circular watches. I found a link where someone does a pretty good job estimating the dimensions of the watch, which I wanted to share:

http://www.paulsprangers.com/2014/09/apple-watch-dimensions/

Here are Paul's estimates for the large model:

The body including sensor: 36.2 mm wide x 42 mm tall x 12.6 mm deep
(The watch body without the pulse sensor on back is only 10.6 mm deep)

Another gentleman in the comments section estimated them similarly:

38mm version: 33mm wide × 38mm tall × 12.4mm deep
42mm version: 36.4mm wide ×42mm tall × 13mm deep

In comparison, the Moto 360 is a 46mm circle, and is 11.5mm in height.

I think this is why the Apple Watch needs to be seen in person, and all the hands-on reviewers aren't complaining about the watch being large or tall. The Apple Watch height is only around 1.5mm higher than the Moto 360, but a couple of millimeters of that is the sensor section that sticks out in the back, and the straps of the Apple Watch attach in the middle of the case, rather than at the bottom like the Moto, so it doesn't feel as if it sits as high. As far as height and width, both Apple Watches are noticeably smaller than the Moto (assuming these size estimates are in the right ballpark.)
 
Well, for one thing, looking at pics of the Moto shows that the band is mounted at the bottom of the housing, almost like the watch was placed on top of the band. So you see the complete thickness at all angles.

In contrast, the Apple Watch's band connects higher up on the housing. In the pics of the metal link band, only half the height of the housing is visible above where the band connects. Probably helps to disguise some of the thickness.

It in interesting that apple would go with the mechanical crown on the side, since its fixed size will fight the effort to make future versions thinner and thinner. Maybe they already have ideas to replace or minimize it going forward.
 
Well, for one thing, looking at pics of the Moto shows that the band is mounted at the bottom of the housing, almost like the watch was placed on top of the band. So you see the complete thickness at all angles.

In contrast, the Apple Watch's band connects higher up on the housing. In the pics of the metal link band, only half the height of the housing is visible above where the band connects. Probably helps to disguise some of the thickness.

It in interesting that apple would go with the mechanical crown on the side, since its fixed size will fight the effort to make future versions thinner and thinner. Maybe they already have ideas to replace or minimize it going forward.

Yeah, that was my point. Even though the Apple Watch is a little thicker, it probably wears thinner than the Moto, because of the strap placement.

I'd imagine that could make the crown a little smaller in future versions, and it'll still be usable. Either way, 12mm-13mm thick is inline with an average size dive watch, these days, so they may not be too concerned about the size. That Ikepod Megapode that Jony Ive likes to wear is something like 16mm thick.
 
Wonder why they didn't go with a touchpad on the side like Google Glass. Maybe they couldn't get the control precise enough (Glass touchpad isn't very precise at all)
 
Did a bunch of diagrams analyzing the dimensions of the Apple Watch here:
http://www.gavinjensen.com/design/2014/9/13/what-are-the-dimensions-of-the-new-apple-watch

Image

Omega Planet Ocean (left) and Rolex Sea Dweller (right)
03.jpg

both around 14.5mm

Rolex GMT Master 2
DSC03033.JPG

12.5mm

PAM 111
434137d1305052233-panerai-wrist-size-tripz.jpg

15mm thick

Vacheron Constantin Overseas Date: ? mm
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore Diver 15703ST: 13.90mm
vacheron_image.2947143.jpg


Breitling Navitimer B01
Navitimer_01_01.jpg

17mm thick

RM11
16mm thick
925561_529940583795503_1945606653_a.jpg


Patek Philippe Sky Moon Tourbillon
Patek-Philippe-Sky-Moon-Tourbillon-5002P.jpg

16.25mm

Forgive me for this ****** picture but these are my watches: Patek Calatrava 5127 and Rolex GMT Master
http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/09/11/thumbnail/ragy5amy.jpg
Top: ~12.5mm
Bottom: ~8mm
But that's a dress watch.

Maybe you like think watches but that's a personal preference.
Apple Watch is not thick.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.