Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Makosuke

macrumors 604
Original poster
Aug 15, 2001
6,830
1,569
The Cool Part of CA, USA
I've been waiting for BareFeats to get their hands on one of these things to see what their testing shows. First set of benchmarks:


It's only compared to the i7 13" MBP currently, but the FCPP and Lightroom Classic results are absolutely mind-blowing. These aren't synthetic benchmarks--these are minutes-long, processing-intensive, real-world operations, and the M1 bested the i7-1068NG7 by well over two minutes... in an operation that took it three minutes.

The M1 comes in at 3.5x faster in a lengthy Lightroom Classic operation, and it's running under Rosetta. FCPX transcode is well over 5x faster. The GPU gaming benchmarks are not as ridiculous, but still over double the performance of Intel's previous-gen GPU in two of three tests.

I've been as impressed as anybody with the synthetic benchmark performance of the M1, but these results are just ridiculous. One assumes part of the reason for this is that it's not just CPU--these kind of image-manipulation actions presumably combine CPU, GPU, specialized processing units, and advantages of the memory architecture, but this shows that in situations where the chip can really bring all of its architectural advantages to bear the potential benefits are something else entirely.
 
Since BareFeats hasn't put the M1 up against against other Macs yet, I looked at some of their earlier tests for a general idea. The OS is different, the software might have been tweaked over the last 6 months, and I can't be 100% sure the methodology is identical, but the results should be at least generally indicative.

With those caveats, it appears that the M1 13" MBP doing an FCPX transcode is only a hair slower than the 8-core iMac Pro with a Vega 64 and 16GB of HBM2. It's about 20% faster than a 2019 16" MBP with 8-core i9 and Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB of HBM2.

I'm not sure whether the "enhance 12 images in Lightroom Classic" test is identical, but if it's even similar the performance is about 70% better than the above 16" MBP and around double the iMac Pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Train
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.