Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


On this week's episode of The MacRumors Show, we talk through how the global memory shortage is forcing Apple's hand across multiple key products, killing configurations, delaying launches, and prompting spec decisions that would have seemed unlikely a year ago.


The pressure originates outside Apple's control. JPMorgan analysis cited by the Financial Times found that memory could account for as much as 45% of an iPhone's component costs by 2027, up from around 10% today. Companies like Nvidia are reportedly outbidding consumer electronics makers for limited DRAM supply from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron, while cloud firms are locking in capacity with multi-billion-dollar upfront commitments. Apple, which buys memory for roughly 250 million iPhones per year, has shifted from a position where it could dictate terms to one where it must compete for supply, and component prices are being driven up as a result.

The consequences are already visible in the Mac lineup. Apple last week removed the Mac mini's 256GB storage option, pushing its starting price from $599 to $799. Days later, it eliminated Mac mini models with 32GB and 64GB of RAM and stripped the M3 Ultra Mac Studio to a single 96GB configuration, with delivery estimates for remaining Studio models at 9 to 10 weeks. The Mac Studio had already lost its 512GB memory option in March, and multiple configurations became entirely unavailable in April. On Apple's April 30 earnings call, CEO Tim Cook acknowledged that both machines would be "hard to get for months to come" and said Apple expects "significantly higher memory costs" in the current quarter.

The MacBook Neo was sold out through April and Cook described demand on the earnings call as "off the charts." The MacBook Neo uses binned A18 Pro chips, adopting manufacturing rejects from the iPhone 16 lineup with one GPU core disabled, repurposed rather than discarded to keep costs low enough to hit the $599 price point.

Apple's initial production target is believed to be about five to six million units, but demand has since pushed the company to instruct suppliers to prepare for at least 10 million. TSMC's N3E production lines, where the A18 Pro was made, are now running at maximum capacity, with AI-related orders consuming much of the available output. A fresh manufacturing run for the A18 Pro would yield fully functional chips rather than defective ones, raising the per-unit cost before any expedited manufacturing premium is applied.

Apple is now said to be weighing up its options for the MacBook Neo. The company is purportedly considering cutting the 256GB entry-level model, which would push the effective starting price up by $100 without changing any existing configuration's price, the same mechanism used with the Mac mini. Separately, Apple may be considering new color options to soften any price increase.

Upcoming products are apparently being reshaped too. Weibo leaker "Fixed Focus Digital" has claimed in a series of posts that the standard iPhone 18 is being downgraded as a cost-cutting measure, with both display and chip specifications affected. Most recently, the leaker said certain parts are interchangeable between the iPhone 18 and the lower-cost iPhone 18e. For context, iPhone 17 and iPhone 17e differ meaningfully: the standard model has a larger ProMotion display, Dynamic Island, Ultra Wide camera, five-core GPU, and significantly better battery life, but it looks like there could be fewer differences with the next generation.

A follow-up post framed the new split launch strategy, under which the iPhone 18 ships in spring 2027 rather than alongside the Pro models in the fall, as a deliberate commercial mechanism to smooth out demand. By extending the iPhone 17's flagship run, Apple is also said to be creating conditions under which a lower-specced successor will be more palatable. The split launch itself has been widely reported since last year, with Ming-Chi Kuo and Nikkei among those to have corroborated it.

The launch of the rumored all-new high-end MacBook Pro or "MacBook Ultra" with an OLED display and touchscreen has also apparently slipped. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman has said early 2027 is now looking more likely than late 2026 due to Apple's constrained memory supply.

The MacRumors Show has its own YouTube channel, so make sure you're subscribed to keep up with new episodes and clips.



You can also listen to The MacRumors Show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Overcast, or other podcast apps. You can also copy our RSS feed directly into your player... Click here to read rest of article

Article Link: The MacRumors Show: Is Apple Downgrading iPhone 18 Due to Memory Shortage?
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Z-4195
My biggest fear when they talk about cost-cutting, is they may start using TLC NAND flash, undermining the device’s lifespan to save some money on Apple’s end. Really worried about this potential shift.

On the other hand, I would really like to stay loyal to my SE 3. Theoretically I’ll have at least two more years of iOS updates, plus two more years of security patches, so a total of 4 more years. However… I’m not sure the performance and efficiency will be as good as it currently is on iOS 26…
 
I appreciate the way this whole "What is meant by a downgrade?!?" conversation was addressed in the video; it's obviously a concern for a lot of users, and the rumors revolving around this have been anything but clear. (But to be fair... they're rumors! Wha-da-ya-want, eh?)

I personally still think that we're almost certainly missing some part of the story, but only time will tell.
 
Don't cheap out on the pro max models or for any model for that matter I have been a faithful Apple user since day one when Steve introduce the first phone
 
Friggin A.I. 😠 This is just gonna keep getting worse with these a.i. companies hoarding all the ram. At what point does Apple take some of it’s Trillions and buy out one of these ram manufacturers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gshake
Actually, if they were going to do that, it would need to've already happened. Nobody would sell to them now; the business is far too profitable.
True. But a.i. is just gonna keep demanding more and more ram to the point where Apple & other tech companies will need to do SOMETHING. Like maybe starting their own ram manufacturing company. What good are having Trillions of dollars if you’re not gonna put it to good use. And it seems that this a.i. ram situation is just going to keep getting worse. Eventually Apple will have to take action.
 
With the prices going up and supplies being eaten up, maybe this will spur a focus shift to efficiency and optimization. Hey! A guy can dream.
I mean they’ll have to to some extent… there is a lot we take for granted now that eats a lot of memory and is not essential to functionality. We just like our tech to have pretty UI with realtime effects and rendered for retina displays.

But if we want to start somewhere, I’d say the web. It’s bonkers to me that a single Gmail tab can use 1.5-2GB of RAM just idling on the inbox. we speed ran away from server-side platforms like PHP to huge JS libraries that run JIT and use a lot of resources on the end users computer.
 
I completely understand. After all, it would be unacceptable if the shareholders had to go without buying, say, a private jet or their own island. We users can surely compromise on features.
 
That's life, folks.
That's life and that's Apple.

Years ago they achieved and maintained an admirable balance between well designed high value products, and maintaining reasonable but not excessive profit margins.

Some of the present day products seem shortchanged in the interest of maximum profits. Always the master of marketing spin, they continue to convince most of their followers that Apple knows best.
 
I've always thought that most customers overspend, buying devices that are more powerful than what they objectively need. If people were more rational, the iPhone 17e would represent the large majority of iPhone sales.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zenmacx
I've always thought that most customers overspend, buying devices that are more powerful than what they objectively need. If people were more rational, the iPhone 17e would represent the large majority of iPhone sales.
Well said!

One area of Apple’s expertise is convincing buyers to spend obscene amounts of money on top of the line devices when most of them will use only a fraction of their features.

Appealing to their narcissistic tendencies, prominently featuring the Apple logo, it’s about being seen with the latest iPhone.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.