Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

awshucks

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Sep 13, 2023
353
1,123
The Studio
And this is all because it lacks "Macro".

Before macro was enabled by the ultra wide camera, it was integrated into the main camera since the 3GS. So, when taking photos of objects 7-8” away from the lens, like daylily blooms, it does well. I have won photo contests with these kinds of photos. But, with the ultra wide camera getting macro, that capability was taken away from the main lens. So, when taking photos at 1x, it actually crops what the 0.5x lens sees, giving an artificially scaled up 3MP-4MP photo on my 15 Pro. My daylily photos look noticeably worse in 1x on the 15 Pro compared a family member’s 13 (not pro) which lacks extreme closeup "macro". On the 16 Pro and 17 series phones that have the 48MP Ultra Wide, it makes a scaled up 12MP photo instead of a full-quality 48MP photo. Plus, the UW sensor is smaller, so not as much detail.

I have tried every setting possible and have even downloaded third party camera apps, but Apple has either software limited the camera or there are different optics.

However, the digital 12MP 2x lens helps to alleviate those problems somewhat, although it still is not as good as what was taken on the iPhone 13 or even the iPhone X.

So, when taking pictures of objects at about 7" distance in 1x, AND having full 48MP resolution at that, I think the iPhone Air will be an awesome camera to take flower bloom photos with.



iPhone Air users, please enjoy your phones. If you chose a different model, I hope you enjoy your phone as well. We should not be swayed by the keyboard warriors and should think with logic instead of negative hype.
 
Last edited:
And this is all because it lacks "Macro".

Before macro was enabled by the ultra wide camera, it was integrated into the main camera since the 3GS. So, when taking photos of objects 7-8” away from the lens, like daylily blooms, it does well. I have won photo contests with these kinds of photos. But, with the ultra wide camera getting macro, that capability was taken away from the main lens. So, when taking photos at 1x, it actually crops what the 0.5x lens sees, giving an artificially scaled up 3MP-4MP photo on my 15 Pro. Plus, the UW sensor is smaller, so not as much detail. My daylily photos look noticeably worse in 1x on the 15 Pro compared a family member’s 13 (not pro) which lacks extreme closeup "macro".

I have tried every setting possible and have even downloaded third party camera apps, but Apple has either software limited the camera or there are different optics.

However, the digital 12MP 2x lens helps to alleviate those problems somewhat, although it still is not as good as what was taken on the iPhone 13 or even the iPhone X.

So, when taking pictures of objects at about 7" distance in 1x, AND having full 48MP resolution at that, I think the iPhone Air will be an awesome camera to take flower bloom photos with.



I'm so sick of the negativity on this platform that you may call this one of my last posts here. After this thread I probably will not come back to MacRumors.

iPhone Air users, please enjoy your phones. If you chose a different model, I hope you enjoy your phone as well. We should not be swayed by the keyboard warriors and should think with logic instead of negative hype.
You do realize the ultra-wide on the 16 and 17 series is 48mp right? Your examples are referencing a 12mp ultra-wide on the 15 series.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awshucks
I don't get it. You're saying the 1x on the 17 Pro is worse than the Air? You can turn off the macro lens. Let's not compare with older generation iPhones as that confuses things.

Do you have any comparison photos between 17 Pro and Air?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.