But if it's so portable and light it will tip over when you touch the screen. Unless you make it a convertible tablet thing with a detachable screen, which would be an iPad Pro running OSX. People have wanted that for years and it is quite clear that it's not the direction Apple wants to go.
Have you ever used a touch screen laptop?Before your roast, I think the MacBook is portable and light enough so that a touch screen would be convenient.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see a 15” iPad Pro with Magic Keyboard that doubles as a MacBook (it might be branded as the latter). Up until now, it hasn’t been practical to produce a Surface-like device because Macs ran on x64 and iPads ran on ARM. I don’t foresee a full merger between iPad and Mac anytime soon, but there is definitely overlap between the two lines (particularly between the iPad Pro and the MacBook Air/13” MacBook Pro).Have you ever used a touch screen laptop?
I have had several over the years. I currently have a maxed out ZenBook Duo. Amazing machine, haven't touched the display more than once or twice, each time accidentally while adjusting the display angle. Touch screen laptops are a nice trick to impress, but have been useless to me.
This debate's been around for a while and yet Apple showed off MacOS 11 on ARM running iOS/iPadOS apps running natively, meaning no Rosetta or Catalyst-like layer. That's like Apple daring you to demand a touch screen.
Before your roast, I think the MacBook is portable and light enough so that a touch screen would be convenient.
It's like a tablet with keyboard, just 1000 times better IMO bc it has full software support
A touch screen would be super useful IMO
Apple has stated many times they have no intention of ever releasing a 2-in-1 device like that.