A person shall be entitled to a patent unless [...]
(b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States
Additional tidbits as food for thought:
http://9to5mac.com/2011/10/25/slide-to-unlock-patented/
For the actual patent documentation go to http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm and enter the patent number, 8,046,721
This references an earlier patent, #7657849 filed Dec 2005.
Both seem similar; each is titled "Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image"
Another tidbit:
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/1500_1504_02.htm#sect1504.02
I think the N1m was out in March 2005 or so, which would be less than the 12 months mentioned given the date the patent was filed. I'm not sure the iphone release date is relevant here.
It will be interesting to see how it plays out in the courts.
and yes, the patent system definitely needs rework, it hasn't kept up with the very short product cycles in todays world.
While the phone was less than 12 months before means it was pretty much feature locked a long time before hand and would predate Apple Patents.
Immaterial when they "did" it, it's when it was used in a sold product that matters.
not to discredit something with prior art or show it a simple and logical (both of which invalidated a patent.
Sold only tells you when it was sold. Does not tell you when it was invented and first used.
Invented and first used is the killer part of it.
I think the N1m was out in March 2005 or so, which would be less than the 12 months mentioned given the date the patent was filed. I'm not sure the iphone release date is relevant here.
Apple's got a new patent for unlocking in any random direction.
Only Android devices use this, none of the Apple devices have this. Isn't that stupid?