This is a somewhat random post, but I wanted to share the way I think about photography and video. It starts off with a bit of a story
The project I'm currently working on has a video component, and I am far from the worlds best 'video person'. I've worked quite a bit with video but I just don't really like it. There so much more planning and set up and not to mention the light get really hot really fast. But, moving on. I drew up a basic story board for a promotional/ advert video for a product and at the time everything looked good. As I shot the scenes this morning everything looked good and a couple shots turned out exactly how I had wanted them to.
The trouble came when I started editing the clips together. They didn't flow as well as they should have. As I looked at each clip and back at my story board I started to realise why: I drafted out still images that moved.
With photography, we obviously can't actually show motion. We can hint at it, but ultimately between each frame in a series the viewer has to imagine the connections and the motion that happened in between.
I finally was able to put together my thoughts about video: I don't view it as a full story with transitions and characters moving from one place to another. I view it as a still image that takes place in the fourth dimension. I think this is one reason why time lapse movies have always interested me and why I find short, almost "test shots" to be better than a full blown short film (at least when I'm creating it).
Looking back on the video I have shot in the past it's always a way to capture the moment when a series of still images wouldn't work. There are some things that are better captured at 30 frames per second. On a side note, this is why I can't wait to get a DSLR that shoots video.
I would love to know what everyone else thinks about the topic.
Here's one of the clips and accompanying photos from this morning: http://flic.kr/s/aHsjvqkz19
The project I'm currently working on has a video component, and I am far from the worlds best 'video person'. I've worked quite a bit with video but I just don't really like it. There so much more planning and set up and not to mention the light get really hot really fast. But, moving on. I drew up a basic story board for a promotional/ advert video for a product and at the time everything looked good. As I shot the scenes this morning everything looked good and a couple shots turned out exactly how I had wanted them to.
The trouble came when I started editing the clips together. They didn't flow as well as they should have. As I looked at each clip and back at my story board I started to realise why: I drafted out still images that moved.
With photography, we obviously can't actually show motion. We can hint at it, but ultimately between each frame in a series the viewer has to imagine the connections and the motion that happened in between.
I finally was able to put together my thoughts about video: I don't view it as a full story with transitions and characters moving from one place to another. I view it as a still image that takes place in the fourth dimension. I think this is one reason why time lapse movies have always interested me and why I find short, almost "test shots" to be better than a full blown short film (at least when I'm creating it).
Looking back on the video I have shot in the past it's always a way to capture the moment when a series of still images wouldn't work. There are some things that are better captured at 30 frames per second. On a side note, this is why I can't wait to get a DSLR that shoots video.
I would love to know what everyone else thinks about the topic.
Here's one of the clips and accompanying photos from this morning: http://flic.kr/s/aHsjvqkz19