Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The weather in Houston is NaN
- Thread starter commonpeople
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Pack your bags and run! The end is near! Or just restart, that should clear up the problem, I think.
DZ/015 said:
It does it after a restart of the widget. The error must be on the server. Somebody divided by zero.
I would get under something sturdy quickly!
"nan" is a type of Indian bread. That could hurt if it hits you after falling thousands of feet from the sky!
"nan" is a type of Indian bread. That could hurt if it hits you after falling thousands of feet from the sky!
are you sure you're connected to the internets?
My Widget's working just fine... (77096, fwiw)
Maybe do a restart of your computer?
My Widget's working just fine... (77096, fwiw)
Maybe do a restart of your computer?
katie ta achoo said:
Weirdo. Yes, I'm connected to the internets or you wouldn't be reading my reply. I'm using Houston, TX in the input panel.
Just checked, I got the same using 77096, but other cities work fine.
Edit: No, I was mistaken- I only get the error using 'Houston, TX'. Zip codes work fine.
The black hole must have moved. The temperature is now 24 degrees, down (up? sideways?) from NaN.
Must be a slow Sunday. I should get out more.
Must be a slow Sunday. I should get out more.
yg17 said:Are you connected to teh right internets?
The one and only internets that Al Gore invented.
Yah its the same on mine too. Must be the server. (this is in sacramento, ca)
![]()
2 minutes later (after i closed and re-opened the widget):
![]()
2 minutes later (after i closed and re-opened the widget):
Well, I'm connected to teh intarweb and the weather for STL works fine. Maybe one of the internets just doesn't like your cities
You are all reading it wrong. It says "NaNo NaNo NaNo...", which can only mean that video iPod nanos are being announced tomorrow.
Sneaky way of leaking it, Apple.
Sneaky way of leaking it, Apple.
I thought about that, but then it would have been "NaNºº NaNºº NaNºº", which, clearly, it isn't.DZ/015 said:
commonpeople said:
Actually, NaN is not the result of division by zero.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NaN
jsw said:I thought about that, but then it would have been "NaNºº NaNºº NaNºº", which, clearly, it isn't.
Heh heh!! Laughing like a drain!