Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,547
37,900


The Threads social network from Meta is rolling out tags, which work like hashtags on other platforms but include some unique additional functions.

tags-in-threads.jpg

The Threads compose window includes a new # button to add a tag to your post. Unlike hashtags, a tag can be a word or a phrase (with spaces) and does not include the hash symbol, so tags fit into sentences more naturally. Tags can also use special characters.

Typing your tag performs a real-time search of existing tags that you can choose to use, or you can create your own tag. But users can tag only one topic per post to avoid tag spam. Users can click on a tag in a post to open all the posts in the search view.

Tagging a post makes it more easily discoverable in searches of the topic, although all mentions of the used keywords show up in the same search screen, whether or not the posts they are included in have also been tagged.

Currently there is no way to order searches chronologically, and Threads still lacks a trending section. Meta intends to launch Threads in the European Union this month.

Article Link: Threads Introduces Tags, or Hashtags Without the Hash Symbol
 
Threads is not dead yet? Leaving Twitter to join threads is like leaving Syria for North Korea.
No. Meta has already said it's well over 100m MAUs and most of the brands have left Twitter for Threads.

What is positive for everyone is that Threads will soon integrate with ActivityPub. So whether you use Mastodon, Threads or some other app you will be able to talk to each other via an open standard.
 
Good, so idiots don't use them like full stops. Hashtags were supposed to be for tagging things with searchable tags. They ended up being random words Fiat 500 girls finished tweets with #Annoying.
 
Still unavailable in Europe :(

You are not missing out on anything. It is a graveyard already after a couple of weeks.

Meta launched this half-baked product in a rush to capitalize on Twitter’s drama (Musk’s acquisition, name change, dropping engagement, advertisers quitting) and used Instagram’s popularity to create a false idea of user growth, only to prove unable to compete with X.

Edit: Even if Meta manages to bring more functionality to the site, it is still heavily censored compared to Twitter, where you can post nudity and comment on controversial topics from any side of the spectrum without getting banned for 30 days or suspended.
 
Last edited:
No. Meta has already said it's well over 100m MAUs and most of the brands have left Twitter for Threads.

What is positive for everyone is that Threads will soon integrate with ActivityPub. So whether you use Mastodon, Threads or some other app you will be able to talk to each other via an open standard.
Google+ had over 200m "MAUs" before it shut down. These numbers mean very little when it's being force fed to Instagram users.
 
Google+ had over 200m "MAUs" before it shut down. These numbers mean very little when it's being force fed to Instagram users.

Yeah, that can easily come from a small fraction of Instagram users either trying it out of curiosity or accidentally clicking to join.
 
Edit: Even if Meta manages to bring more functionality to the site, it is still heavily censored compared to Twitter, where you can post nudity and comment on controversial things from any side of the spectrum without getting banned for 30 days or suspended.

Unless Musk doesn't like you:


I don't care either way, personally; Twitter and Threads both suck, for the way I use social media. I don't want to see or be seen by anyone other than those I personally follow, and I only follow people I personally know.
 
Still unavailable in Europe :(

I still wonder how their blocking works and why streaming services (thankfully) have not adapted the same technique. Is it tied to your overall META account and they simply know where you are from because VPN does not work and I tried to use the app while I was abroad and it did not work either with my "German" instagram account. I even set up a completely new profile (on VPN) and it worked for like a day before they "caught" it again.
 
No one important is using it. Mostly advertisers and celebrities part of the MICC command and control apparatus. Twitter is still better and actually has content, and unlike the sheep, I don't leave a platform just because the man who bought it is a legend with balls.
Ribbentrop would have concurred.

And LoL bleating out “sheep” as an insult is kind of an own goal guy.

Also worth noting, although musk is the largest individual shareholder w 9%, he’s neither the majority or largest single shareholder in Twitter. He’s only running things because majority holders let him. (And sometimes I wonder if they do because they are playing for capital-losses to offset gains somewhere else.)
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
For every 10 “picks” of censoring in Twitter you can find 1000 in Meta, where even a simple meme can get you suspended, talking from experience.

Meta doesn't claim to be a "free speech absolutist", which I would consider as even one single person/account suspended as hypocritical.

It's weird... I've been using the internet since 1996, and I have never once been banned or suspended from any service, subreddit, facebook group, forum or otherwise....Seems to happen a lot with some people.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Unless Musk doesn't like you:


I don't care either way, personally; Twitter and Threads both suck, for the way I use social media. I don't want to see or be seen by anyone other than those I personally follow, and I only follow people I personally know.

Sorry, but Gizmodo is a left-leaning site. Here is the source. I prefer the center or non-biased site. Sorry, your source doesn't count.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.