Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

rekhyt

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 20, 2008
1,127
78
Part of the old MR guard.
I liked that displayport and thunderbolt had the same port, so you could easily use displayport monitors with standard cables. If they use the USB 3.1 C port for both thunderbolt and USB, that would be ideal. If it's a completely new port design, then they're going to have to make it USB 3.1 C size and release cheap displayport passive adapters.
 
Nothing in that article links Thunderbolt 3 to Skylake, though. It mentions new chipsets, but that could be a Broadwell chipset just as easily as Skylake. In fact, it's probably more likely to come with Broadwell first given where Intel is in that product cycle. What caught my attention though was the bit at the end about USB 3.1 possibly being able to handle Thunderbolt activity itself. That would be huge in terms of unifying things going forward.
 
Nothing in that article links Thunderbolt 3 to Skylake, though. It mentions new chipsets, but that could be a Broadwell chipset just as easily as Skylake. In fact, it's probably more likely to come with Broadwell first given where Intel is in that product cycle. What caught my attention though was the bit at the end about USB 3.1 possibly being able to handle Thunderbolt activity itself. That would be huge in terms of unifying things going forward.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thunderbolt_(interface)#Thunderbolt_3

"Support will be added with Intel's Skylake architecture chipsets, with shipping dates expected from late 2015 into early 2016.[47][48][49]"
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.