May I suggest a rule prohibiting the use of tinyurl.com and similar sites for links posted in posts? There's no need for it. This isn't Twitter and there's no character limit. There is no easy way to verify what the link actually is without clicking on it. You can't verify if it's a legit site or not just by looking at the URL, which is especially frustrating for those of us who browse the forums at work and don't know if we're clicking a link to a legit site like apple.com or to a porn site.
**************************'s domain (l m g t f y.com without the spaces) is censored in the forums, resulting in http://www.*********** when it's in a post. Could the admins do the same for tinyurl.com, bit.ly, etc?
**************************'s domain (l m g t f y.com without the spaces) is censored in the forums, resulting in http://www.*********** when it's in a post. Could the admins do the same for tinyurl.com, bit.ly, etc?