Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

edesignuk

Moderator emeritus
Original poster
Mar 25, 2002
19,232
2
London, England
BBC said:
The UK government is considering intervening in the way broadband is rolled out, in an effort to speed up the deployment of super-fast services.
Stephen Timms, Minister for Competitiveness, ordered a summit to look at the role of government in providing next-generation broadband.

While other countries are investing in new ways to deliver higher bandwidth, the UK is seen as lagging behind.

Mr Timms said broadband infrastructure was one of his "personal priorities".

"Today we face a new challenge. Other countries are starting to invest in new, fibre-based infrastructure, delivering considerably higher bandwidth than is available in the UK today," Mr Timms told the Broadband Stakeholder Group and others attending a meeting on Tuesday evening.

"I have decided to chair a high level summit later this year to consider the circumstances that might trigger public sector intervention and the form that intervention might take," he said.

....

Mr Allan believes that the UK should have 40% of its citizens connected to fibre that can deliver broadband speeds of up to 100Mbps (megabits per second) by 2012.
BBC.

Good! 100Mbps by 2012 will do me nicely thank you.
 
I'd settle for a 3mb connection at this stage.

512kbps for the past 5 years. And there are no plans to upgrade us. Damn you, Saddleworth!
 
just a bit crap that in 2012, 100mbps will be even further behind some countries than we are now...

if that's 40% by 2012, the figure should be nearer 512mbps, or even a gig. this is just too low to compete by that stage.
 
I'm on 24meg right now, its good, but too expensive. For now, it would be nicer to have cheaper prices than faster broadband...
 
If someone offered a high speed link for between £50 - 60 a month I'd be all over it. At the moment I think the fastest we can go is 24Mbps which when combined with the problems that ADSL suffers (i.e not getting the full 24Mbps) it just is not worth it.

Fibre really is the best option and the country would lose out a lot if it fails to take up the technology.
 
If memory serves me correctly, in the 90's BT had asked the government to allow them to overhaul the infrastructure to bring fiber-optic cabling into every home in the country, which would have given people 100mbs connections (at a time when most of us were stuck at 33kbs).

The government refused and insisted they utilise the copper cabling already in place.
 
I can get 20Mb cable at my term time house, and it runs surprisingly high to its full capacity.

At home the maximum we can get is 1Mb, which doesn't even run close.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.