You'd be wasting your money going for a MBA over a MBP 13". Unless you're wife is toting the computer from place-to-place, there is no need to spend the extra money for a MBA since you're paying for its extra portability.
price is not a factor but the air I was looking at was the last model and is cheaper than the mbp.
If you choose the MBA, make sure it's the model with SSD. HD model uses 1.8" HDs which runs at 4200rpm and that's very slooooooooooow.
Once the mba ships with a 512Gb SSD Drive for an extra $300 then the mba wins. Sign me up when that happens.
For browsing the Internet, E-mail, Microsoft Office and similar, I would go for the MBA. It's lighter, thinner and more convenient to carry.i have a 17 inch umbp. my wife is looking for a 13 inch mb to surf the web and use for email. i have been looking at a umbp or the mba. price does not matter. the only thing is it has to be 13 inches.
Absolutely MBP. Sure the Air is more portable, but it's not as if the MBP is big and heavy! It's really thin and light too, plus omissions from the Air like a CD/DVD and more than one USB port are pretty major.
and the lack of an optical drive is an advantage... because it is becoming as obsolete as a floppy drive.
Whichever decision you make... spring for an SSD.
I entirely disagree. When floppies went out, CDs were coming in. What's coming in now, the internet? USB drives? Sure for things like audio CDs those can compare, but for entire installation DVDs, and even things like BD, those things can't compete. And even if optical drives were becoming obsolete, how would not being able to use them be an advantage?
I actually also disagree about that. SSDs are nice and all, but at this point their prices are still crazy high. You can get a hard drive with equivalent storage space for literally a fraction of the price. SSDs are better, but the price isn't worth the benefit in my mind.
HDDs will outperform SSDs for the foreseeable future if you are measuring capacity. SSDs outperform HDDs if you are measuring performance. Most HDDs are capable of 100 - 400 IOPs. By contrast a good SSD might deliver 7,000 - 40,000 IOPs. The difference in end user experience is similar to working on dial-up vs broadband.
Once SSDs reach an acceptable capacity, then performance starts becoming more important. In our desktop computer (PC), we have a 160GB SSD (C: drive) coupled with a 1.5TB HDD (D: drive) for storing data. For us, that combination is a perfect blend of performance and capacity. However, for laptops we do not get the luxury of having dual drives. For my MBP, I have a 160GB SSD which for me is barely sufficient in capacity, but still preferable to an HDD of any capacity. Next year I will upgrade to a 300 GB SSD. The MBA has a 128GB SSD, which is much better than any of the HDD options for the MBA... and for a 2nd machine, the 128GB seems adequate. We also have a 7 TB home server which gives up nearly unlimited "near" data storage. We have a 2TB TimeCapsule just backing up the MBP and MBA.
/Jim