Making these digital copies is getting harder, thanks to secretive anti-counterfeiting technology built into some popular consumer hardware and software products at the request of government regulators and international bankers.
The technology detects and blocks attempts to view, scan or print copies of the redesigned $20 and $50 bills and, in a pop-up window, urges consumers to visit a Web site, www.rulesforuse.org, to learn about international counterfeit laws.
The technology, known as the Counterfeit Deterrence System, was designed by a consortium of 27 central banks in the United States, England, Japan, Canada and across the European Union, the Central Bank Counterfeit Deterrence Group.
Its broad adoption represents one of the rare occasions when the U.S. technology industry has quietly agreed to requests by government and finance officials to include third-party software code in commercial products. Most companies have never publicly revealed to customers they include such counterfeit protections in products.
Precisely how the technology works is a mystery. The U.S. government keeps its inner workings a closely guarded secret, arguing that disclosing too much information could help counterfeiters circumvent protections.
It also has declined to identify which companies have agreed to add the technology in their products, although Kodak, Xerox, Adobe Systems, Ulead Systems and Hewlett-Packard are among those known to use it. The European Union is considering a proposal to require all software companies to include such anti-counterfeit technology.
Elan0204 said:I wonder if this system has been secretly built into Mac OS X? It does say that Adobe uses the system, so it may be built into Photoshop CS for OS X. Anyone want to try scanning a new $20 or $50 bill?
Elan0204 said:I wonder if this system has been secretly built into Mac OS X? It does say that Adobe uses the system, so it may be built into Photoshop CS for OS X. Anyone want to try scanning a new $20 or $50 bill?
PixelFactory said:This is what photoshop says when you try to open an image of a $50 bill. I believe this was in version 7 as well.
Abstract said:Try this: Take a $20.....no wait, a $50, cut it in half, scan both halves separately, then use PS to bring the image back together. Anyone got a $50?![]()
Elan0204 said:I wonder if this system has been secretly built into Mac OS X? It does say that Adobe uses the system, so it may be built into Photoshop CS for OS X. Anyone want to try scanning a new $20 or $50 bill?
emw said:Or just fold it in half and scan each half...
wdlove said:Apparently some programs must allow copying of money. I know of a teenager in my area that printed some money using his computer. The Secret Service confiscated all his hardware. Never heard what happened to him over the incident.
Elan0204 said:Not that his computer somehow reported him to the Secret Service when it detected he was copying money.
jared_kipe said:Thats gotta be some built in tech to not let you scan a dollar bill. I wonder if it works if you scan vertically or upside down.
emw said:Now that would be scary indeed.![]()
thatwendigo said:You better not load any of Adobe's professional programs onto your machine, then, if you think it's scary. Unless you disable the call-home part of their software or use it on a machine with no internet access, it phones home when you're online the next time.
...
A post by one Gunar Penikis, an Adobe employee, claims that they collect no personal information from the process and that you agree to the connection. This might be true, but is it really something you want to trust a company with in an era where Microsoft is trying to have the legality of click-acceptance of EULAs be the de facto standard?
thatwendigo said:You better not load any of Adobe's professional programs onto your machine, then, if you think it's scary. Unless you disable the call-home part of their software or use it on a machine with no internet access, it phones home when you're online the next time.
There are steps you can take to disable the "feature," but I'll not point anyone towards them out of respect for Arn's dislike of cracks and hacks. It's theoretically possible the DMCA could be used to argue that anyone shutting it off only intends to defraud Adobe, since it's part of their serial number verification process.
A post by one Gunar Penikis, an Adobe employee, claims that they collect no personal information from the process and that you agree to the connection. This might be true, but is it really something you want to trust a company with in an era where Microsoft is trying to have the legality of click-acceptance of EULAs be the de facto standard?
dotnina said:I didn't quite understand why this is necessary? Do that many people really make art that features U.S. currency?
And if you really did have a project, wouldn't you just go to the bank and get a $50? Or do they assume artists would never see $50 in real life?![]()
Kidding, of course![]()
wdlove said:Is this feature just for money or does it go to copyright material also. Where does the software make its phone call?
homerjward said:meh, the picture feature thing is cool but LOOK AT THE BILL!! it's awesome--even better than the new 20. imho the use of the flag is the best