Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

imacken

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Feb 28, 2010
1,275
141
When I run BlackMagic Disk Speed Test on my Samsung D3 external USB3.0 drive, I get read and write speeds of 120Mb/s! My iMac late 2015 supports USB3.0, so why should that be?
 
This is a pretty normal speed for a HDD, especially if it's 5400rpm. Your speed in this case is limited by the HDD rather than the interface.
 
When I run BlackMagic Disk Speed Test on my Samsung D3 external USB3.0 drive, I get read and write speeds of 120Mb/s! My iMac late 2015 supports USB3.0, so why should that be?

Because thats how fast HDD's are (well 5400rpm ones anyway the 7200rpm run to about 180Mb/s).
 
Thanks for your help. Supposedly a 7200 in the Samsung, but.....
 
115-120Mb/s is fast. That's already showing 7200 rpm disk speeds. That's why SSD and especially pcie versions are so awesome.
 
The speed depends more on the density of data on the platters than on the spin speed. A 1TB 5400RPM disk will be much faster than something like a 160GB 7200RPM disk. Random seek might take slightly longer on the 5400 RPM drive.

120MB/sec is fast for a spinning disk. A few years ago (maybe around 2010), people couldn't even comprehend that a disk could saturate USB 2.0 (around 35MB/sec) meanwhile my 1TB disks were showing 80-100MB/sec on eSATA. USB3.0 takes away a big bottleneck, but now the disk is the main limitation.
 
When I run BlackMagic Disk Speed Test on my Samsung D3 external USB3.0 drive, I get read and write speeds of 120Mb/s! My iMac late 2015 supports USB3.0, so why should that be?
That would be awesome for a USB 2.0 drive, which would be limited to 48 MB/s, so it's definitely USB 3.0.

Still, Blackmagic shows my LaCie Minimus drive (7200 RPM) at 172 MB/190 MB, so perhaps the Samsung D3 isn't on the leading edge of spinning rust. However, this review

http://www.techradar.com/us/reviews...hdd-ssd/samsung-d3-station-3tb-1183543/review

says that 216MB/s and 203MB/s should be possible.

So there's possibly some other things going on.

Is it formatted as NTFS? HFS+? Is it encrypted?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for that. It's formatted as HFS+ and not encrypted.
The review did say that those speeds were not seen in real-world tests', so, not sure.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.