Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ped

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jan 31, 2005
191
0
Looks like the carriers are stepping up against Apple in its attempts to stifle Samsung's ability to sell its popular smartphones and tablets in some countries.

That’s right, Verizon, which only got to sell the iPhone earlier this year, is siding against Apple. And that should scare Apple, and the other mobile patent warriors. No software or hardware vendor in the space can be successful out of a larger context. Make enough waves, and some are bound to come sailing back to smack you.

Apple doesn’t rule the business

Given the popularity of the iPhone, you might at first think that it would be insane for a carrier to oppose Apple. But that’s actually not the case. AT&T (T) did attract and retain a lot of business by having an exclusive on the product. And yet, Verizon managed to remain huge selling Android. (Samsung claims that it has sold 10 million Galaxy S II phones alone.)

In other words, there’s much more to success in wireless than selling a particular phone. As much as it astounds the fanboys, there are people who don’t like Apple and the iPhone. Just as there are people who hate Android and Google. Who knows? We may eventually find that there are people who are happy to buy a handset running Microsoft (MSFT) Windows Phone.

Verizon wanted the iPhone for strategic considerations. Having it helped retain whatever percentage of their customers might have switched to AT&T to get the product. Most of the ones who would have probably already did. And offering the iPhone lowered a barrier for consumers who insisted on having it but who didn’t like AT&T’s service.

Why did Apple make the iPhone available to Verizon? Because the only other choice was to cede all those tens of millions of consumers to the Google clan. And Apple wants to keep a hefty pace of growth. It can’t do that restricting itself to the same resellers and their customers. Continued international growth is vital, but much of the low-hanging fruit is gone. That’s a big reason why the AT&T exclusive, which effectively cut Apple off from much of the U.S. market, had to go out the window.

Can you hear them now?

Apple is in a world where it cannot completely set the agenda, no matter how much control it exerts over the operating system, hardware, and delivery of music, video, publications, and software. That’s because the ecosystem still isn’t complete. It sits on networks that others own.


Rest of the article:
http://www.bnet.com/blog/technology-business/verizon-to-apple-step-away-from-that-samsung/13032
 
If Apple can stop ban Samsung products for "looking like the iPhone" then down the line they could probably find similar looking phones by Motorola, HTC, LG, etc and try to ban those as well...

As a super powerful carrier like Att, Sprint, Verizon, etc you can't let a phone manufacturer (even as big as Apple) try to cut off your other sources of revenue in Android phones and dictate your business model.

Glad that the carriers are getting involved in this to tell Apple to back the **** off. Really hope Apple loses this lawsuit nonsense and Samsung (and other manufacturers) can make similar great looking phones in the future :)
 
Trying to ban other phones = bad business for carriers.

Other companies will probably go against Apple on this.
 
I can see how a carrier, who's goal is to commoditize cell phones so the network is the only differentiator, would find copycat products desirable.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.