Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,488
37,766


Back in January, well-known Mac accessory company OWC introduced the Thunderbolt Go Dock, which it says is the first full-featured Thunderbolt dock equipped with a convenient built-in power supply. We were able to get our hands on one of the new docks, and thought we'd test it out for those who are interested.


If you've used a Thunderbolt 4 dock, you know that most of them require a separate power supply to operate peripheral devices and provide passthrough charging. They're often much more inconvenient than a bus-powered dock because of the bulk and the extra cable component.

The OWC Thunderbolt Go Dock's power supply is included in the dock enclosure, so it's an all-in-one device that does not require you to have an extra power brick. That functionality is useful at home, but also on the go if you need to work while traveling or away from your house. Note that you still need a power cable as the dock has to be plugged in, but it uses a single cord that plugs directly into the dock rather than into a separate power brick.

There are a total of 11 ports, including three Thunderbolt 4 ports, one USB-C ports, three USB-A ports, an HDMI port, an Ethernet port (2.5 Gbps), an SD card reader, and an audio jack. The dock offers 90W of pass-through charging, so it's suitable for all of Apple's MacBooks. The only downside is the price, which is $349.

That's not too outrageous for a Thunderbolt 4 dock given the built-in power supply and the number of ports, but there are cheaper Thunderbolt 4 options out there for those who don't need this functionality, and it is not as full-featured as some competing docks at a similar price. This particular dock is best for those who need something that's convenient for use in multiple locations given its portability.

What do you think of the Thunderbolt Go Dock? Let us know in the comments below.

Article Link: Video: Testing OWC's Thunderbolt 4 Dock With Built-In Power Supply
 
  • Like
Reactions: icanhazmac
Remember when your MacBook came with pretty much all the ports you needed?

Haha... exactly!

And yet... we've finally gotten to a place where one port can pretty much do anything... some would even call it a "universal" port...

But we still need to turn that port into a dozen other ports.

Oh well...

🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwdsail and drrich2
Looks good... but why is there still a USB 2.0 port included on many of these modern docks?

I never understood that. The USB spec is backwards-compatible by nature.

Do certain devices work best on a dedicated USB 2.0 port? USB mouse receivers?

🤔
I think because there are still a number of USB specific legacy peripherals around. Old SuperDrive laying around? Monitor calibrator? Dare I say ZipDrive? Why use a 3.0 slot for that?
 
I think because there are still a number of USB specific legacy peripherals around. Old SuperDrive laying around? Monitor calibrator? Dare I say ZipDrive? Why use a 3.0 slot for that?

My question is from the manufacturing and engineering side.

If you're putting three USB-shaped holes in the dock... why not make them do all the same things?

Why make one port the "slow" port?

I see what you're saying... why waste a "good" port on a floppy drive.

Here's the thing though... USB is backwards compatible. USB 3.0 ports can become USB 2.0 ports.

But USB 2.0 ports can never be USB 3.0 ports.

That's why I'm questioning why they would put different ports with different capabilities. Why not make them all "good" ports?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Forgive my newbie question please; with this dock can you use the laptop in clamshell mode? If so, is this dock compatible with the old Cinema Display?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Packdude
My question is from the manufacturing and engineering side.

If you're putting three USB-shaped holes in the dock... why not make them do all the same things?

Why make one port the "slow" port?

I see what you're saying... why waste a "good" port on a floppy drive.

Here's the thing though... USB is backwards compatible. USB 3.0 ports can become USB 2.0 ports.

But USB 2.0 ports can never be USB 3.0 ports.

That's why I'm questioning why they would put different ports with different capabilities. Why not make them all "good" ports?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I suspect this is built into which ever chipset they are using along with the audio chip. For the minimal cost of the usb physical port and a few traces on the circuit board you get one more port to pad the port count. Give the industry more time and I think you'll stop seeing dedicated USB 2 ports.
 
Looks good... but why is there still a USB 2.0 port included on many of these modern docks?

I never understood that. The USB spec is backwards-compatible by nature.

Do certain devices work best on a dedicated USB 2.0 port? USB mouse receivers?

🤔

Some devices get interferences with USB 3.0. Would rather plug into USB 2.0. ie. ZeeBee ConBee II won't work properly if plugged into USB 3.0
 
this docks make sense on old generation MacBooks, with this new generation MacBooks never felt the necessity to use external docks.
 
I have the little OWC hub. The power supply is HUGE and the AC cable is very bulky and stiff (both the line and load side cable and connectors.) For the price they charge, seems OWC could take note of Apple's products in this arena. Also the USB C connectors don't have a very tight fit. They fall out pretty easily if the hub is inadvertently moved. Lost HD connections a couple times from this. Kinda wish I'd just bought a Mac Studio instead of my M2 Mini w/ only two TB ports (the 4 TB port M2 Mini wasn't out yet.)
 
Last edited:
My question is from the manufacturing and engineering side.

If you're putting three USB-shaped holes in the dock... why not make them do all the same things?

Why make one port the "slow" port?

I see what you're saying... why waste a "good" port on a floppy drive.

Here's the thing though... USB is backwards compatible. USB 3.0 ports can become USB 2.0 ports.

But USB 2.0 ports can never be USB 3.0 ports.

That's why I'm questioning why they would put different ports with different capabilities. Why not make them all "good" ports?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
My guess is bandwith. Lets say you're splitting a TB4 channel into some 3.0 and some audio and sd card slot and my guess is there's some bandwith leftover for usb 2.0 so why not. It's probably already part of the controller card.
 
I have the little OWC hub. The power supply is HUGE and the AC cable is very bulky and stiff (both the line and load side cable and connectors. For the price they charge, seems OWC could take note of Apple products in this arena. Also the USB C connectors don't have a very tight fit. They fall out pretty easily if the hub is inadvertently moved. Lost HD connections a couple times from this. Kinda wish I'd just bought a Mac Studio instead of my M2 Mini w/ only two TB ports (the 4 TB port M2 Mini wasn't out yet.)
Same here on mine. I like it but have to be very gentle or the usb-c in the back come loose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SSDGUY and ric22
this docks make sense on old generation MacBooks, with this new generation MacBooks never felt the necessity to use external docks.
If you had two Studio Displays that had to be connected to the Macbook Pro along with other external hard drives and such you'd find a dock indispensable.
 
I want a dock that I can plug a Studio Display in. It may be that they simply can't do that period. As far as I know they simply have to be plugged directly into your mac.
 
Looks good... but why is there still a USB 2.0 port included on many of these modern docks?

I never understood that. The USB spec is backwards-compatible by nature.

Do certain devices work best on a dedicated USB 2.0 port? USB mouse receivers?

🤔
Not enough bandwidth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Packdude
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.