Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,490
37,776


The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has approved the merger between Vodafone and Three UK, clearing the way for the creation of Britain's largest mobile operator. The approval comes with legally binding commitments requiring both companies to invest billions in rolling out their combined 5G network across the country.

Three-and-Vodafone-Logo-Article.jpg

The CMA's decision appears to be something of a turnaround from its initial concerns in September, when it warned the merger could lead to higher prices for customers. The regulatory body now says it's satisfied that the proposed network commitment, along with consumer protections, will address competition concerns.

Under the terms of the approval, the merged company must fulfill several key obligations over the next eight years. These include implementing a comprehensive network upgrade plan and adhering to price controls for the first three years. The agreement also requires the company to offer preset contractual terms to mobile virtual network operators that rely on their infrastructure.

The combined entity will serve approximately 27 million mobile subscriptions, surpassing current market leaders Virgin Media O2 and EE. Vodafone will initially hold a 51 percent stake in the venture, with plans to acquire the remaining 49 percent after three years.

In a press release statement, Stuart McIntosh, chair of the CMA's independent inquiry group, said: "Having carefully considered the evidence, as well as the extensive feedback we have received, we believe the merger is likely to boost competition in the UK mobile sector and should be allowed to proceed."

The merger's implementation will be jointly overseen by the CMA and Ofcom, the UK's communications regulator. The combined company will be required to publish annual reports detailing its progress on the network plan, with the CMA specifically monitoring consumer tariffs and wholesale terms.

The £16.5 billion ($20.9 billion) deal is expected to complete in the first half of 2025, pending the companies' formal acceptance of the CMA's conditions. Notably, the same competition watchdog last year initially blocked UK approval for Microsoft's proposed $69 billion takeover of Activision Blizzard, before later clearing it under a new deal in which Microsoft would not acquire Activision's cloud streaming rights outside the EEA.

Article Link: Vodafone-Three Merger Approved by UK Regulator With 5G Investment Conditions
 
Why do these deals get approved. There is so much evidence globally that going from 4 to 3 big players in an industry is bad.
At a guess - because the state of the UK’s current 5G infrastructure is woeful - the majority of masts outside of London are just 4G repackaged as 5G, so the government needs someone to do some investment…
 
Can't wait for my prices to go up...

I use Smarty, a Three MVNO (owned by the same parent company) and get totally unlimited calls, text and 5G data for £16 a month. Vodafone's prices don't come anywhere near that, and their cheaper plans are speed-restricted. Not good news.
 
Good luck. Anything Vodafone touches goes down the drain, at least here in Germany. Only o2 is even worse "o2 can't do"
I hate Vodafone, I am on Smarty, which is a virtual network using Three, it is great, but I dread it when Vodaofone gets hold of it.
The problem is, we have less choice, we have EE, whihc I detest because it is part of BT. and O2, which belongs to Virgin, where if you have problem, don't ring them as you will get ignored.

i know Three was Chinese, but their network here is prety good, certainly compared to the others. I amnotbothered about 5G, whihc is useless if you enter a building anyway, all I want is a signal that i can use., I don't need super-duper fast broadband on my phone.
4G is fine, in fact that is all my phone can use
 
Can't wait for my prices to go up...

I use Smarty, a Three MVNO (owned by the same parent company) and get totally unlimited calls, text and 5G data for £16 a month. Vodafone's prices don't come anywhere near that, and their cheaper plans are speed-restricted. Not good news.

You're right, that is a great price. My only issue has been network coverage using the Three network.

I use VOXI. I recommend you take a look. That used the Vodafone network.

For £15 a month, rolling contract you get Unlimited calls, texts and unlimited social data (eg. TikTok, YouTube, Inta etc and Unlimited music data from Apple Music, Spotify etc) + 140GB for other usage per month AND you can tether and get WiFi Calling, 4G Calling and Visual Voicemail etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 75Batt and arkitect
At a guess - because the state of the UK’s current 5G infrastructure is woeful - the majority of masts outside of London are just 4G repackaged as 5G, so the government needs someone to do some investment…
This must be a big factor. Rightly or wrongly the decision to pull out all of the Chinese built equipment has been a huge set back.

I have very little faith that this will lead to any meaningful improvement in coverage though. End of the day these big companies only care about shareholders profits so they’ll cut as many corners as they can get away with.
 
Two of the worst networks in the UK. Maybe they will finally be half decent.

I had a Three number and despite them saying I'd get 5G i only get 4G and it doesn't go beyond 4Mb/s. My O2 number gets 40+Mb/s on 4G and up to about 470Mb/s at home.

O2/EE are the best networks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimthing
I don't use either company so cannot comment on their reliability or otherwise. Less consumer choice is never a good thing, but we do have some pretty solid MVNO laws in the UK which can save customers a lot of money. Despite being owned by the pricier O2 network, Giffgaff for example undercut them a lot on data prices with an easily cancelled rolling monthly plan.
 
If this gets 5g coverage expanding faster with quicker speeds and everything that 5g promised to bring brilliant! I'm on o2 and their network speeds for anything are dire. The only issue I have is in cost, give this a few years with the mandatory investement then when they're outside the agreement time they'll hike up prises "for the benefit of the consumer" using investment in network just as EE do with their prices now.
 
I am against this merger long term. Yes we might gain better 5G coverage because of it but I think the phone companies should be forced to invest into new tech anyway.

This won't be good for the consumer long term. It never is.
It is incredible that here people are complaining due to this reduction in the market supply, when at the same time for them it is bad expanding to new software store and it is better to avoid any competition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ksec
I’ve been on Three (SIM only) since around 2012/2013 for £23 per month with unlimited data, even when tethering. It’s brilliant outside London, at least in the few major cities I visit. This is today in the Midlands.

1733404083640.png
 
Last edited:
Two of the worst networks in the UK. Maybe they will finally be half decent.

I had a Three number and despite them saying I'd get 5G i only get 4G and it doesn't go beyond 4Mb/s. My O2 number gets 40+Mb/s on 4G and up to about 470Mb/s at home.

O2/EE are the best networks.
The worst network is O2 by a long shot. Best is EE but you pay though the nose for it and it’s the worst at my house.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: jimthing
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.