Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ggg05a

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jan 11, 2009
128
0
Does anyone have a clue as to why Apple did not offer the W series Nehelam processors in their current flavor of the MP? They are 130w v 95w of the E series (2.93GHz).

I was thinking it could have been a heat issue . . . any other ideas?

--Garrett
 
Does anyone have a clue as to why Apple did not offer the W series Nehelam processors in their current flavor of the MP? They are 130w v 95w of the E series (2.93GHz).

I was thinking it could have been a heat issue . . . any other ideas?

--Garrett

The 4 core single processors ARE the W series.
 
Ahh I see. Single core MP have the same HS/F as the dual cores?

--Garrett

If you mean "heatsink/fan"... then yes and no. The quads have a bigger heat sink because there is more space, but they have a fan just like the octos. And there is no dual core, only quad or octo.
 
Just curious: why would Apple want to use a chip that uses more power (130W) rather than less (95W)? Isn't having the current Xeon that runs at 95W a good thing, rather than 130?
 
Just curious: why would Apple want to use a chip that uses more power (130W) rather than less (95W)? Isn't having the current Xeon that runs at 95W a good thing, rather than 130?

1) They are cheaper
2) More importantly, the 3500 series are the only Xeons made for single processor setups

And I doubt Apple cares much about TDP on Mac Pros.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.