I've been thinking about the history and current state of the computer industry and have come upon some interesting anomalies.
Steve Jobs - wanted power by bringing creative machines to the masses, instead he's a cool pop culture icon
Bill Gates - wanted to be cool by bringing useful technology to business and home, instead he's a powerful techno overlord figure
Microsoft - brands themselves primarily as a software company, however the vast majority of their software either sucks or is happily mediocre while their hardware branches (mice, XBox) produce a rather good product
Apple - brands themselves primarily as a hardware company, however their hardware is often lackluster in performance (though arguably in amazingly design enclosures) while their software branches (OS X, iLife) produce a rather good product.
We seem to have an industry abundant in misfits.
Steve Jobs - wanted power by bringing creative machines to the masses, instead he's a cool pop culture icon
Bill Gates - wanted to be cool by bringing useful technology to business and home, instead he's a powerful techno overlord figure
Microsoft - brands themselves primarily as a software company, however the vast majority of their software either sucks or is happily mediocre while their hardware branches (mice, XBox) produce a rather good product
Apple - brands themselves primarily as a hardware company, however their hardware is often lackluster in performance (though arguably in amazingly design enclosures) while their software branches (OS X, iLife) produce a rather good product.
We seem to have an industry abundant in misfits.