Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Heh I was getting ready with the "Well you should have listened to rumors" and "Everyone told you to wait, your fault for buying one"

But yea, 300GB would have been nice :p
 
Heh I was getting ready with the "Well you should have listened to rumors" and "Everyone told you to wait, your fault for buying one"

But yea, 300GB would have been nice :p

lol, i was going to add something about the HD to the title but it got kinda long

"well thats not fair why only 300gb on 17"?"

figured "well that not fair..." is a little more forum friendly

but i really dont understand why there is no 320gb option at all...they could even charge one of their outrageous upgrade prices...im sure someone would pay an additional $300 for 320gb
 
I don't get the only 300GB@4200 option at all... and still no user replaceable HDs in the MBP...?!? Come on, Apple...that's just frelled up.

I have a WD 320GB@5400 in my (soon) 2 year MacBook, and - at the moment I wouldn't do an even trade with that for any of the new MBPs...

I'm glad I'm not getting a new MacBook (regular|Air|Pro) until next year. :)
 
eww it is only 4200 well nevermind im not that upset about it not being available on other systems now...not that i was planing on buying a new MBP yet anyway, mine will last me another 6-9 months until the next update
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.